001     878460
005     20230918092251.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1186/s42466-020-00064-2
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/25522
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:85917869
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a 33324924
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:001044706800001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-02865
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Lehmann, Helmar C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy
260 _ _ |a [London]
|c 2020
|b BioMed Central
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1597731278_14214
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a IntroductionPeripheral neuropathy represents a spectrum of diseases with different etiologies. The most common causes are diabetes, exposure to toxic substances including alcohol and chemotherapeutics, immune-mediated conditions, and gene mutations. A thorough workup including clinical history and examination, nerve conduction studies, and comprehensive laboratory tests is warranted to identify treatable causes.First stepsThe variability of symptoms allows distinguishing characteristic clinical phenotypes of peripheral neuropathy that should be recognized in order to stratify the diagnostic workup accordingly. Nerve conduction studies are essential to determine the phenotype (axonal versus demyelinating) and severity. Laboratory tests, including genetic testing, CSF examination, nerve imaging, and nerve biopsy, represent additional clinical tests that can be useful in specific clinical scenarios.CommentsWe propose a flow chart based on five common basic clinical patterns of peripheral neuropathy. Based on these five clinical phenotypes, we suggest differential diagnostic pathways in order to establish the underlying cause.ConclusionsThe recognition of characteristic clinical phenotypes combined with nerve conduction studies allows pursuing subsequent diagnostic pathways that incorporate nerve conduction studies and additional diagnostic tests. This two-tiered approach promises higher yield and better cost-effectiveness in the diagnostic workup in patients with peripheral neuropathy.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Wunderlich, Gilbert
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Sommer, Claudia
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
773 _ _ |a 10.1186/s42466-020-00064-2
|g Vol. 2, no. 1, p. 20
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2947493-0
|n 1
|p 20
|t Neurological research and practice
|v 2
|y 2020
|x 2524-3489
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878460/files/Lehmann_2020_Neurological%20Research%20and%20Practice_Diagnosis%20of%20peripheral%20neuropathy.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878460/files/Lehmann_2020_Neurological%20Research%20and%20Practice_Diagnosis%20of%20peripheral%20neuropathy.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:878460
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21