% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Homann:878609,
author = {Homann, Gerrit and Stolz, Lukas and Winter, Martin and
Kasnatscheew, Johannes},
title = {{E}limination of “{V}oltage {N}oise” of {P}oly
({E}thylene {O}xide)-{B}ased {S}olid {E}lectrolytes in
{H}igh-{V}oltage {L}ithium {B}atteries: {L}inear versus
{N}etwork {P}olymers},
journal = {iScience},
volume = {23},
number = {6},
issn = {2589-0042},
address = {St. Louis},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-02947},
pages = {101225 -},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Frequently, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based solid polymer
electrolytes (SPEs) reveal a failure with high-voltage
electrodes, e.g. LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 in lithium metal
batteries, which can be monitored as an arbitrary appearance
of a “voltage noise” during charge and can be attributed
to Li dendrite-induced cell micro short circuits. This
failure behavior disappears when incorporating linear
PEO-based SPE in a semi-interpenetrating network (s-IPN) and
even enables an adequate charge/discharge cycling
performance at 40°C. An impact of any electrolyte oxidation
reactions on the performance difference can be excluded, as
both SPEs reveal similar (high) bulk oxidation onset
potentials of ≈4.6 V versus Li|Li+. Instead, improved
mechanical properties of the SPE, as revealed by compression
tests, are assumed to be determining, as they mechanically
better withstand Li dendrite penetration and better maintain
the distance of the two electrodes, both rendering cell
shorts less likely.},
cin = {IEK-12},
ddc = {050},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
pnm = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32563154},
UT = {WOS:000548211500007},
doi = {10.1016/j.isci.2020.101225},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878609},
}