guest ::
| Home > Publications database > A functional–structural model of upland rice root systems reveals the importance of laterals and growing root tips for phosphate uptake from wet and dry soils > print |
| Home > Publications database > A functional–structural model of upland rice root systems reveals the importance of laterals and growing root tips for phosphate uptake from wet and dry soils > print |
| 001 | 878667 | ||
| 005 | 20210130005719.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1093/aob/mcaa120 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0003-4754 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0305-7364 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1095-8290 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/25770 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:85037583 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:32597468 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000591847300020 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2020-02988 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 580 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a De Bauw, Pieterjan |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a A functional–structural model of upland rice root systems reveals the importance of laterals and growing root tips for phosphate uptake from wet and dry soils |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Oxford |c 2020 |b Oxford University Press |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1601044481_15197 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Background and AimsUpland rice is often grown where water and phosphorus (P) are limited. To better understand the interaction between water and P availability, functional–structural models that mechanistically represent small-scale nutrient gradients and water dynamics in the rhizosphere are needed.MethodsRice was grown in large columns using a P-deficient soil at three P supplies in the topsoil (deficient, sub-optimal and non-limiting) in combination with two water regimes (field capacity vs. drying periods). Root system characteristics, such as nodal root number, lateral types, interbranch distance, root diameters and the distribution of biomass with depth, as well as water and P uptake, were measured. Based on the observed root data, 3-D root systems were reconstructed by calibrating the structural architecure model CRootBox for each scenario. Water flow and P transport in the soil to each of the individual root segments of the generated 3-D root architectures were simulated using a multiscale flow and transport model. Total water and P uptake were then computed by adding up the uptake by all the root segments.Key ResultsMeasurements showed that root architecture was significantly affected by the treatments. The moist, high P scenario had 2.8 times the root mass, double the number of nodal roots and more S-type laterals than the dry, low P scenario. Likewise, measured plant P uptake increased >3-fold by increasing P and water supply. However, drying periods reduced P uptake at high but not at low P supply. Simulation results adequately predicted P uptake in all scenarios when the Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) was corrected for diffusion limitation. They showed that the key drivers for P uptake are the different types of laterals (i.e. S- and L-type) and growing root tips. The L-type laterals become more important for overall water and P uptake than the S-type laterals in the dry scenarios. This is true across all the P treatments, but the effect is more pronounced as the P availability decreases.ConclusionsThis functional–structural model can predict the function of specific rice roots in terms of P and water uptake under different P and water supplies, when the structure of the root system is known. A future challenge is to predict how the structure root systems responds to nutrient and water availability. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |c POF3-255 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Mai, Trung Hieu |0 P:(DE-Juel1)168562 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schnepf, Andrea |0 P:(DE-Juel1)157922 |b 2 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Merckx, Roel |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Smolders, Erik |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Vanderborght, Jan |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129548 |b 5 |u fzj |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1093/aob/mcaa120 |g p. mcaa120 |0 PERI:(DE-600)1461328-1 |n 4 |p 789–806 |t Annals of botany |v 126 |y 2020 |x 1095-8290 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878667/files/DeBauwetal_2020.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878667/files/mcaa120.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878667/files/DeBauwetal_2020.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878667/files/mcaa120.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:878667 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB:Earth_Environment |p VDB |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)157922 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129548 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2020 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b ANN BOT-LONDON : 2018 |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a National-Konsortium |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430 |2 StatID |d 2019-12-21 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |d 2019-12-21 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2019-12-21 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2019-12-21 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|