% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schmid:878675,
      author       = {Schmid, Christoph A. O. and Reichel, Rüdiger and
                      Schröder, Peter and Brüggemann, Nicolas and Schloter,
                      Michael},
      title        = {52 years of ecological restoration following a major
                      disturbance by opencast lignite mining does not reassemble
                      microbiome structures of the original arable soils},
      journal      = {The science of the total environment},
      volume       = {745},
      issn         = {0048-9697},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-02993},
      pages        = {140955 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Opencast mining for lignite continuously creates areas of
                      land that require restoration. Here we applied a
                      chronosequence approach to investigate the development of
                      soil bacterial communities during 52 years as influenced by
                      the restoration process and subsequent changes in soil
                      physico-chemical conditions starting from the initial
                      reclamation of the sites. By comparison with the unaffected
                      soils near the mine, we were able to address the question if
                      soil bacterial communities have reached a steady state
                      within 52 years, which is comparable to the original soil.
                      Our study revealed three distinct phases of the restoration
                      process, each with a specific bacterial community
                      composition. The effect size of these changes was similar to
                      the one observed for seasonal dynamics at our sites. At the
                      beginning of the restoration process Flavobacteriaceae,
                      Cytophagaceae and Sphingobacteriaceae were found as typical
                      members of the bacterial community as well as Rhizobiales as
                      a result of the cultivation of alfalfa on the restored
                      plots. At later stage the families Peptostreptococcaceae,
                      Desulfurellaceae as well as Streptomycetaceae increased in
                      relative abundance and became dominant members of the
                      bacterial community. Even though overall bacterial abundance
                      and richness exhibited values comparable to the original
                      soil already 5 years after the start of the restoration
                      process, main responder analyses reveal differences in the
                      bacterial community structure even 52 years after the start
                      of the restoration process. Mostly Nitrospirae were reduced
                      in abundance in the soils restored for 52 years compared to
                      the original soils. To broaden the significance of our
                      study, we compared our data bioinformatically with published
                      results from other restored areas, which were previously
                      affected by opencast mining. Despite different durations of
                      the different restoration phase, we could observe a large
                      degree of conformity when bacterial patterns of succession
                      were compared indicating common modes of action of
                      ecological restoration tools for bacterial communities.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
                      (POF3-255)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32721609},
      UT           = {WOS:000579365600123},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140955},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878675},
}