000884056 001__ 884056
000884056 005__ 20210130005808.0
000884056 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.physa.2020.125156
000884056 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0378-4371
000884056 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-2119
000884056 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/25723
000884056 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000580429800024
000884056 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-03067
000884056 082__ $$a500
000884056 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhu, Yu$$b0
000884056 245__ $$aFollow the evacuation signs or surrounding people during building evacuation, an experimental study
000884056 260__ $$aAmsterdam$$bNorth Holland Publ. Co.$$c2020
000884056 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000884056 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000884056 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1600881276_17523
000884056 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000884056 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000884056 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000884056 520__ $$aEvacuation signage playsa vital role in building evacuation. In order to test the efficiency of evacuation signage, the traditional methods are video analysis and after-drill questionnaires and the human factors are rarely considered. This paper investigates the impact of surrounding pedestrians on the sign guidance efficiency during building emergency evacuation, replacing the traditional ways with eye tracking device method. More than 500 participants wereinvolved in the series of experiments to testthe influence of surrounding people on detecting and following signages. It is found that a) the subjective ignorance and objective ignorance of signs exist obviously and areaffected by surrounding people number; b) strangers and acquaintances have similar effect on the sign detection probability and direction choosing probability in the safe and quick evacuation experiments, contrary to general belief; c) One surrounding personhas an important influence on the sign guidance effect, especially on the following probability, while three surrounding peoplenot. Based on the results of the experiments, a new logic of wayfinding within rooms was put forward and simulated to compared with the original logic. It is shown that the average right direction choosing percentage decreases by30% after considering the effect of surrounding pedestrians, proving that the impact of surrounding pedestrians must be considered in evacuation modeling and evacuation route design.
000884056 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511$$a511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF3-511)$$cPOF3-511$$fPOF III$$x0
000884056 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000884056 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aChen, Tao$$b1
000884056 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDing, Ning$$b2$$eCorresponding author
000884056 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)132077$$aChraibi, Mohcine$$b3
000884056 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFan, Wei-Cheng$$b4
000884056 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1466577-3$$a10.1016/j.physa.2020.125156$$gp. 125156 -$$p125156 -$$tPhysica / A Statistical mechanics and its applications$$v560$$x0378-4371$$y2020
000884056 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/884056/files/Paper_draft_Zhu2020.pdf$$yPublished on 2020-08-26. Available in OpenAccess from 2022-08-26.
000884056 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:884056$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000884056 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)132077$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000884056 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lSupercomputing & Big Data$$vComputational Science and Mathematical Methods$$x0
000884056 9141_ $$y2020
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPHYSICA A : 2018$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-02-27
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2020-02-27$$wger
000884056 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-02-27
000884056 920__ $$lyes
000884056 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321$$kIAS-7$$lZivile Sicherheitsforschung$$x0
000884056 980__ $$ajournal
000884056 980__ $$aVDB
000884056 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000884056 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
000884056 9801_ $$aFullTexts