001     884056
005     20210130005808.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125156
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0378-4371
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-2119
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/25723
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000580429800024
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-03067
082 _ _ |a 500
100 1 _ |a Zhu, Yu
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Follow the evacuation signs or surrounding people during building evacuation, an experimental study
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam
|c 2020
|b North Holland Publ. Co.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1600881276_17523
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Evacuation signage playsa vital role in building evacuation. In order to test the efficiency of evacuation signage, the traditional methods are video analysis and after-drill questionnaires and the human factors are rarely considered. This paper investigates the impact of surrounding pedestrians on the sign guidance efficiency during building emergency evacuation, replacing the traditional ways with eye tracking device method. More than 500 participants wereinvolved in the series of experiments to testthe influence of surrounding people on detecting and following signages. It is found that a) the subjective ignorance and objective ignorance of signs exist obviously and areaffected by surrounding people number; b) strangers and acquaintances have similar effect on the sign detection probability and direction choosing probability in the safe and quick evacuation experiments, contrary to general belief; c) One surrounding personhas an important influence on the sign guidance effect, especially on the following probability, while three surrounding peoplenot. Based on the results of the experiments, a new logic of wayfinding within rooms was put forward and simulated to compared with the original logic. It is shown that the average right direction choosing percentage decreases by30% after considering the effect of surrounding pedestrians, proving that the impact of surrounding pedestrians must be considered in evacuation modeling and evacuation route design.
536 _ _ |a 511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF3-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|c POF3-511
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Chen, Tao
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Ding, Ning
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Chraibi, Mohcine
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132077
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Fan, Wei-Cheng
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125156
|g p. 125156 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1466577-3
|p 125156 -
|t Physica / A Statistical mechanics and its applications
|v 560
|y 2020
|x 0378-4371
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/884056/files/Paper_draft_Zhu2020.pdf
|y Published on 2020-08-26. Available in OpenAccess from 2022-08-26.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:884056
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132077
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|l Supercomputing & Big Data
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PHYSICA A : 2018
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-02-27
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-02-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-02-27
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
|k IAS-7
|l Zivile Sicherheitsforschung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21