001     884284
005     20220930130251.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00191
024 7 _ |2 Handle
|a 2128/25794
024 7 _ |2 altmetric
|a altmetric:91225311
024 7 _ |a WOS:000577947700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-03176
082 _ _ |a 333.7
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|a Wulf, Christina
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Review of Power-to-X demonstration projects in Europe
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|b Frontiers Media
|c 2020
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1601486346_28529
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a Core of most Power-to-X (PtX) concepts is the utilization of renewable electricity to produce hy-drogen via water electrolysis. This hydrogen can be used directly as final energy carrier or can be converted further into e.g. methane, synthesis gas, liquid fuels, electricity or chemicals. To inte-grate PtX into energy systems, technical demonstration and systems integration are of major im-portance. In total 220 PtX research and demonstration projects to analyze these issues have been realized, are already finished or in the planning in Europe by June 2020. Key issue of this review is the identification and assessment of relevant projects regarding year of commissioning, location, electricity and carbon dioxide sources, applied technologies for electrolysis, capacity, type of hy-drogen post-processing, as well as the aimed field of application. Latter changed over the years. At the beginning, it was fuel production, e.g. for hydrogen busses, and combined heat and power gen-eration, later injection into the natural gas grid. Today industrial applications and once again fuel production are important applications. Focus for the fuel production is synthetic gaseous fuels, while production of liquid fuels is severely under-represented. The SOEC (solid oxide electrolyzer cell) has a very small share in projects compared to PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane) and alka-line electrolyzers. This is also reflected by the different installed capacities. While alkaline electro-lyzers are installed with capacities between 50 and 5000 kW (2019/20) and PEM electrolyzers be-tween 100 and 6000 kW, SOEC have a size of 150 kW. France and Germany show the biggest ef-forts into the development of PtX technologies compared to other European countries. Overall, ac-tivities have progressed considerably faster than predicted just a couple of years ago.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|a Zapp, Petra
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130483
|a Schreiber, Andrea
|b 2
|u fzj
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2733788-1
|a 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00191
|g Vol. 8, p. 191
|p 191
|t Frontiers in energy research
|v 8
|x 2296-598X
|y 2020
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/884284/files/2020-07%20Statement%20-%20J%C3%BClich.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/884284/files/2020-07%20Statement%20-%20J%C3%BClich.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/884284/files/fenrg-08-00191-1.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/884284/files/fenrg-08-00191-1.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:884284
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 0
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 1
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130483
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 2
|k FZJ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
|a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|a Fees
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|a Peer Review
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|a Article Processing Charges
|f 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-01-06
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-01-06
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21