% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Dieken:884693,
author = {Dieken, Sophia and Venghaus, Sandra},
title = {{P}otential pathways to the {G}erman {B}ioeconomy: {A}
media discourse analysis of public perceptions},
journal = {Sustainability},
volume = {12},
number = {19},
issn = {2071-1050},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-03194},
pages = {7987 -},
year = {2020},
abstract = {The bioeconomy has emerged as a popular, but ambiguous
vision for a sustainable future. Its implementation depends
not only on novel products and production processes, but
also on balancing diverse interests, values, and
interpretations of the concept. The German government’s
plan to develop a sustainable bioeconomy in response to
structural change in the lignite mining regions provides a
unique opportunity to investigate what pathways towards the
bioeconomy are supported by society. In order to
characterize bioeconomy visions prevalent in public
perception, we conducted a computer-assisted, mixed-methods
discourse analysis of German-language newspaper articles
published between 2010 and 2019. Results show that a
techno-economic vision is dominant over ecological and
social aspects, suggesting only one clear pathway to the
German bioeconomy, which is increasingly criticized in the
public debate.},
cin = {IEK-STE},
ddc = {690},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
pnm = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000586546500001},
doi = {10.3390/su12197987},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/884693},
}