% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Schemme:885414,
      author       = {Schemme, Steffen},
      title        = {{T}echno-ökonomische {B}ewertung von {V}erfahren zur
                      {H}erstellung von {K}raftstoffen aus {H}$_{2}$ und
                      {CO}$_{2}$},
      volume       = {511},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Jülich},
      publisher    = {Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-03811},
      isbn         = {978-3-95806-499-7},
      series       = {Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich. Reihe Energie
                      $\&$ Umwelt / Energy $\&$ Environment},
      pages        = {360 S.},
      year         = {2020},
      note         = {RWTH Aachen, Diss., 2020},
      abstract     = {Power-to-Fuel technologies are indispensable for achieving
                      a largely CO$_{2}$-neutral energy supply in the future. The
                      scientific contribution of this work is to answer the
                      questions how technically mature, energy-intensive, and
                      expensive different Power-to-Fuel concepts are compared to
                      each other. Forthis purpose, H$_{2}$-based production
                      processes of eleven different standard-compliant transport
                      fuels were techno-economically compared. The methodological
                      focus is on the homogeneity of the calculations to ensure
                      comparability as well as on the process engineering and
                      design to be able to supply technically and scientifically
                      sound recommendations. The simulation-based and therefore
                      technically robust assessment was carried out using the
                      process simulation software Aspen Plus$^{®}$. Thus,
                      possibilities in terms of production technologies were
                      revealed, and efficiencies as well as costs were determined.
                      For the process engineering analyses, all required chemical
                      plants have been designed in Aspen Plus$^{®}$, whereby
                      technically established processes were adapted and missing
                      sub-processes or synthesis routes were fully new developed.
                      This includes, for instance, fully new process concepts for
                      the H$_{2}$-based synthesis for higher alcohols.
                      Subsequently, all sub-processes of promising synthesis
                      routesbased on H$_{2}$ and CO$_{2}$ were simulated,
                      evaluated, and compared techno-economically. The
                      comparability of the simulations and calculations is ensured
                      by the strict compliance of identical assumptions and
                      boundary conditions. The simulation models were modularized,
                      a validated physico-chemical model for the description of
                      missing component systems was implemented in Aspen
                      Plus$^{®}$ and all unit operations were designed in detail
                      to determine the process utility demand. The heat
                      integration of the sub-processes or synthesis routes is tied
                      to common utilities of a chemical production location
                      (Verbund site). The products largely meet today’s fuel
                      standards. All designed process concepts have no by-products
                      except water, since even non-recyclable by-products of the
                      reactions are converted to synthesis gas using reformers,
                      which can be recycled. Thus, the process concepts are
                      suitable for large-scale use. The sensitivity of the results
                      to the assumptions and boundary conditions was analyzed and
                      assessed. With the holistic picture of Power-to-Fuel
                      concepts and products, this work aims to provide a robust
                      basis for integrating Power-to-Fuel concepts in simulations
                      of future energy systems and energy supply strategies as
                      well as for recommendations regarding the choice of
                      transport fuels for a future at best CO$_{2}$-neutral
                      mobility.},
      cin          = {IEK-14},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129},
      pnm          = {135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)3 / PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      urn          = {urn:nbn:de:0001-2020103003},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885414},
}