% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Chen:885505,
author = {Chen, Bin J. W. and During, Heinjo J. and Vermeulen, Peter
J. and Kroon, Hans and Poorter, Hendrik and Anten, Niels P.
R.},
title = {{T}he analysis of plant root responses to nutrient
concentration, soil volume and neighbour presence:
{D}ifferent statistical approaches reflect different
underlying basic questions},
journal = {Functional ecology},
volume = {34},
number = {10},
issn = {1365-2435},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-03885},
pages = {2210 - 2217},
year = {2020},
abstract = {To investigate the responses of plants to their
below‐ground neighbours independently of nutrient
availability, experiments generally require a solitary
treatment with one plant grown alone with one unit of
nutrients, and a neighbour treatment with two plants grown
together with two units of nutrients. This can either be
done by doubling nutrient concentration (C) or by doubling
soil volume (V) in the neighbour treatment as compared to
the solitary treatment. Statistically analysing the same
dataset from an experiment that grew plants in solitary or
neighbour treatment with a series of V given a fixed amount
of nutrients per plant (e.g. 1 g), Chen et al. (2015a) found
significant neighbour effects when they controlled for V,
while McNickle (2020) found the effects to be insignificant
when he controlled for C. The discrepancy in the results of
the two studies is caused by a difference in their
analytical approaches. This includes (a) different choices
of data transformation for the controlling factor, and (b) a
mathematical deviation of model structures between V‐based
and C‐based analyses, due to the different inversely
proportional V‐C relationships between solitary
urn:x-wiley:02698463:media:fec13664:fec13664-math-0001 and
neighbour
urn:x-wiley:02698463:media:fec13664:fec13664-math-0002
treatments. Choices for either V or C as a controlling
factor in the analyses for ‘neighbour effect’ are based
on two different perspectives, focussing either on
neighbour‐induced nutrient depletion (like McNickle, 2020)
or on identity recognition (like Chen et al., 2015a). We
also raise concerns about the use of mesh‐divided root
interaction design and replacement series design in the
studies of plant–plant root interactions. We propose to
adjust the experimental designs and analytical methods based
on the focal perspectives of neighbour effect.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582) / 2171 - Biological and
environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000575479500018},
doi = {10.1111/1365-2435.13664},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885505},
}