% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Puglielli:885506,
      author       = {Puglielli, Giacomo and Laanisto, Lauri and Poorter, Hendrik
                      and Niinemets, Ülo},
      title        = {{G}lobal patterns of biomass allocation in woody species
                      with different tolerance of shade and drought: evidence for
                      multiple strategies},
      journal      = {The new phytologist},
      volume       = {229},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1469-8137},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-03886},
      pages        = {308-322},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {The optimal partitioning theory predicts that plants of a
                      given species acclimate to different environments by
                      allocating a larger proportion of biomass to the organs
                      acquiring the most limiting resource. Are similar patterns
                      found across species adapted to environments with
                      contrasting levels of abiotic stress?We tested the optimal
                      partitioning theory by analysing how fractional biomass
                      allocation to leaves, stems and roots differed between woody
                      species with different tolerances of shade and drought in
                      plants of different age and size (seedlings to mature trees)
                      using a global dataset including 604 species.No overarching
                      biomass allocation patterns at different tolerance values
                      across species were found. Biomass allocation varied among
                      functional types as a result of phenological (deciduous vs
                      evergreen broad-leaved species) and broad phylogenetical
                      (angiosperms vs gymnosperms) differences. Furthermore, the
                      direction of biomass allocation responses between tolerant
                      and intolerant species was often opposite to that predicted
                      by the optimal partitioning theory.We conclude that plant
                      functional type is the major determinant of biomass
                      allocation in woody species. We propose that interactions
                      between plant functional type, ontogeny and species-specific
                      stress tolerance adaptations allow woody species with
                      different shade and drought tolerances to display multiple
                      biomass partitioning strategies},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {217 - Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von
                      Ressourcen zu Produkten (POF4-217) / 2171 - Biological and
                      environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:33411342},
      UT           = {WOS:000579527300001},
      doi          = {10.1111/nph.16879},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885506},
}