001     885511
005     20211025141311.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1111/bor.12470
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0300-9483
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1502-3885
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26983
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:91913243
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000575426300001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-03891
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Pötter, Stephan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Middle to Late Pleistocene environments based on stable organic carbon and nitrogen isotopes of loess‐palaeosol sequences from the Carpathian Basin
260 _ _ |a Oslo
|c 2021
|b Univ.-Forl.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1635160591_2772
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Stable organic carbon and nitrogen isotopes can be used to interpret past vegetation patterns and ecosystem qualities. Here we present these proxies for two loess‐palaeosol sequences from the southern Carpathian Basin to reconstruct the palaeoenvironment during the past 350 ka and establish regional commonalities and differences. Before now, isotopic studies on loess sequences from this region were only conducted on deposits from the last glacial cycle. We conducted methodological tests involving the complete decalcification of the samples prior to stable isotope analyses. Two decalcification methods (fumigation method and wet chemical acidification), different treatment times, and the reproducibility of carbon isotope analyses were tested. Obtained results indicate that the choice of the decalcification method is important for organic carbon stable isotope analyses of loess‐palaeosol sequences because ratios vary by more than 10‰ between the wet chemical and fumigation methods, due to incomplete carbonate removal by the latter. Therefore, we suggest avoiding the fumigation method for studies on loess‐palaeosol sequences. In addition, our data show that samples with TOC content <0.2% bear increased potential for misinterpretation of their carbon isotope ratios. For our sites, C3‐vegetation is predominant and no palaeoenvironmental shifts leading to a change of the dominant photosynthesis pathway can be detected during the Middle to Late Pleistocene. Furthermore, the importance of further stable nitrogen isotope studies is highlighted, since this proxy seems to reflect past precipitation patterns and reveals favourable conditions in the southern Carpathian Basin, especially during interstadials.
536 _ _ |a 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Schmitz, Arndt
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Lücke, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129567
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Schulte, Philipp
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Obreht, Igor
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Zech, Michael
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Wissel, Holger
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129557
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Marković, Slobodan B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Lehmkuhl, Frank
|0 0000-0002-6876-7377
|b 8
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/bor.12470
|g p. bor.12470
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2028632-6
|n 1
|p 184-204
|t Boreas
|v 50
|y 2021
|x 1502-3885
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885511/files/bor.12470.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:885511
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129567
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129557
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2020-02-26
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BOREAS : 2018
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-02-26
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-02-26
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21