001     885559
005     20210104120139.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1177/0885328220963918
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0885-3282
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1530-8022
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26630
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 33331198
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000583370400001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-03930
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Roman Marius
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a A peritoneal defect covered by intraperitoneal mesh prosthesis effects an increased and distinctive foreign body reaction in a minipig model
260 _ _ |a Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]
|c 2020
|b Sage
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1609264461_12842
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial supportfor the research, authorship, and/or publication of thisarticle: This study was granted by the BMBF (FederalMinistry of Education and Research) (Funding number:13N12599.
520 _ _ |a Background: The incidence of incisional hernia is with up to 30% one of the frequent long-term complication afterlaparotomy. After establishing minimal invasive operations, the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique(lap. IPOM) was first described in 1993. Little is known about the foreign body reaction of IPOM-meshes, which covereda defect of the parietal peritoneum. This is becoming more important, since IPOM procedure with peritoneal-sacresection and hernia port closing (IPOM plus) is more frequently used.Methods: In 18 female minipigs, two out of three Polyvinylidene-fluoride (PVDF) -meshes (I: standard IPOM; II: IPOMwith modified structure [bigger pores]; III: IPOM with the same structure as IPOM IIþdegradable hydrogel-coating)were placed in a laparoscopic IPOM procedure. Before mesh placement, a 2x2cm peritoneal defect was created. After30 days, animals were euthanized, adhesions were evaluated by re-laparoscopy and mesh samples were explanted forhistological and immunohistochemichal investigations.Results: All animals recovered after implantation and had no complications during the follow-up period. Analysingforeign body reaction, the IPOM II mesh had a significant smaller inner granuloma, compared to the other meshes (IPOMII: 8.4 mm1.3 vs. IPOM I 9.1 mm1.3, p<0.001). The degradable hydrogel coating does not prevent adhesionsmeasured by Diamond score (p¼0.46). A peritoneal defect covered by a standard or modified IPOM mesh was asignificant factor for increasing foreign body granuloma, the amount of CD3þ lymphocytes, CD68þ macrophages anddecrease of pore size.Conclusion: A peritoneal defect covered by IPOM prostheses leads to an increased foreign body reaction compared tointact peritoneum. Whenever feasible, a peritoneal defect should be closed accurately before placing an IPOM-mesh toavoid an excessive foreign body reaction and therefore inferior biomaterial properties of the prosthesis.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Kroh, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Eickhoff, Simon
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Heise, Daniel
|0 0000-0001-6923-0849
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Helmedag, Marius Julian
|0 0000-0002-8914-7978
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Tolba, Rene H
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Klinge, Uwe
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Neumann, Ulf Peter
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Klink, Christian Daniel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Lambertz, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
773 _ _ |a 10.1177/0885328220963918
|g p. 088532822096391 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2072559-0
|n 6
|p 732-739
|t Journal of biomaterials applications
|v 35
|y 2020
|x 1530-8022
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885559/files/0885328220963918.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:885559
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J BIOMATER APPL : 2018
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0410
|2 StatID
|d 2020-01-11
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-01-11
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-01-11
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-01-11
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
|k INM-7
|l Gehirn & Verhalten
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21