% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Chayambuka:885680,
      author       = {Chayambuka, Kudakwashe and Mulder, Grietus and Danilov,
                      Dmitri L. and Notten, Peter H. L.},
      title        = {{F}rom {L}i‐{I}on {B}atteries toward {N}a‐{I}on
                      {C}hemistries: {C}hallenges and {O}pportunities},
      journal      = {Advanced energy materials},
      volume       = {10},
      number       = {38},
      issn         = {1614-6840},
      address      = {Weinheim},
      publisher    = {Wiley-VCH},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04011},
      pages        = {2001310 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Among the existing energy storage technologies,
                      lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) have unmatched energy density
                      and versatility. From the time of their first
                      commercialization in 1991, the growth in LIBs has been
                      driven by portable devices. In recent years, however,
                      large‐scale electric vehicle and stationary applications
                      have emerged. Because LIB raw material deposits are unevenly
                      distributed and prone to price fluctuations, these
                      large‐scale applications have put unprecedented pressure
                      on the LIB value chain, resulting in the need for
                      alternative energy storage chemistries. The sodium‐ion
                      battery (SIB) chemistry is one of the most promising
                      “beyond‐lithium” energy storage technologies. Herein,
                      the prospects and key challenges for the commercialization
                      of SIBs are discussed. By comparing the technological
                      evolutions of both LIBs and SIBs, key differences between
                      the two battery chemistries are unraveled. Based on
                      outstanding results in power, cyclability, and safety, the
                      path toward SIB commercialization is seen imminent.},
      cin          = {IEK-9},
      ddc          = {050},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218},
      pnm          = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000558672700001},
      doi          = {10.1002/aenm.202001310},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885680},
}