000885812 001__ 885812
000885812 005__ 20210130010523.0
000885812 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/su12198225
000885812 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/25955
000885812 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:92956717
000885812 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000586718600001
000885812 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04103
000885812 041__ $$aEnglish
000885812 082__ $$a690
000885812 1001_ $$00000-0002-1576-8069$$aJunne, Tobias$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000885812 245__ $$aEnvironmental sustainability assessment of multi-sectoral energy transformation pathways: Methodological approach and case study for Germany
000885812 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2020
000885812 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000885812 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000885812 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1603718312_4385
000885812 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000885812 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000885812 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000885812 520__ $$aIn order to analyse long-term transformation pathways, energy system models generally focus on economical and technical characteristics. However, these models usually do not consider sustainability aspects such as environmental impacts. In contrast, life cycle assessment enables an extensive estimate of those impacts. Due to these complementary characteristics, the combination of energy system models and life cycle assessment thus allows comprehensive environmental sustainability assessments of technically and economically feasible energy system transformation pathways. We introduce FRITS, a FRamework for the assessment of environmental Impacts of Transformation Scenarios. FRITS links bottom-up energy system models with life cycle impact assessment indicators and quantifies the environmental impacts of transformation strategies of the entire energy system (power, heat, transport) over the transition period. We apply the framework to conduct an environmental assessment of multi-sectoral energy scenarios for Germany. Here, a ‘Target’ scenario reaching 80% reduction of energy-related direct CO2 emissions is compared with a ‘Reference’ scenario describing a less ambitious transformation pathway. The results show that compared to 2015 and the ‘Reference’ scenario, the ‘Target’ scenario performs better for most life cycle impact assessment indicators. However, the impacts of resource consumption and land use increase for the ‘Target’ scenario. These impacts are mainly caused by road passenger transport and biomass conversion
000885812 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$a153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)$$cPOF3-153$$fPOF III$$x0
000885812 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000885812 7001_ $$00000-0003-2775-5457$$aSimon, Sonja$$b1
000885812 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBuchgeister, Jens$$b2
000885812 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSaiger, Maximilian$$b3
000885812 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBaumann, Manuel$$b4
000885812 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHaase, Martina$$b5
000885812 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aWulf, Christina$$b6
000885812 7001_ $$00000-0003-2390-1672$$aNaegler, Tobias$$b7
000885812 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2518383-7$$a10.3390/su12198225$$gVol. 12, no. 19, p. 8225 -$$n19$$p8225 -$$tSustainability$$v12$$x2071-1050$$y2020
000885812 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885812/files/sustainability-12-08225-v2.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000885812 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885812/files/sustainability-12-08225-v2.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000885812 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:885812$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000885812 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000885812 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vAssessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security$$x0
000885812 9141_ $$y2020
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bSUSTAINABILITY-BASEL : 2018$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$f2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-01-15
000885812 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-01-15
000885812 920__ $$lyes
000885812 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000885812 980__ $$ajournal
000885812 980__ $$aVDB
000885812 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000885812 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000885812 9801_ $$aFullTexts