Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Environmental sustainability assessment of multi-sectoral energy transformation pathways: Methodological approach and case study for Germany > print

001     885812
005     20210130010523.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/su12198225
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/25955
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:92956717
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000586718600001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-04103
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Junne, Tobias
|0 0000-0002-1576-8069
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Environmental sustainability assessment of multi-sectoral energy transformation pathways: Methodological approach and case study for Germany
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2020
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1603718312_4385
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a In order to analyse long-term transformation pathways, energy system models generally focus on economical and technical characteristics. However, these models usually do not consider sustainability aspects such as environmental impacts. In contrast, life cycle assessment enables an extensive estimate of those impacts. Due to these complementary characteristics, the combination of energy system models and life cycle assessment thus allows comprehensive environmental sustainability assessments of technically and economically feasible energy system transformation pathways. We introduce FRITS, a FRamework for the assessment of environmental Impacts of Transformation Scenarios. FRITS links bottom-up energy system models with life cycle impact assessment indicators and quantifies the environmental impacts of transformation strategies of the entire energy system (power, heat, transport) over the transition period. We apply the framework to conduct an environmental assessment of multi-sectoral energy scenarios for Germany. Here, a ‘Target’ scenario reaching 80% reduction of energy-related direct CO2 emissions is compared with a ‘Reference’ scenario describing a less ambitious transformation pathway. The results show that compared to 2015 and the ‘Reference’ scenario, the ‘Target’ scenario performs better for most life cycle impact assessment indicators. However, the impacts of resource consumption and land use increase for the ‘Target’ scenario. These impacts are mainly caused by road passenger transport and biomass conversion
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Simon, Sonja
|0 0000-0003-2775-5457
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Buchgeister, Jens
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Saiger, Maximilian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Baumann, Manuel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Haase, Martina
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Wulf, Christina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Naegler, Tobias
|0 0000-0003-2390-1672
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/su12198225
|g Vol. 12, no. 19, p. 8225 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2518383-7
|n 19
|p 8225 -
|t Sustainability
|v 12
|y 2020
|x 2071-1050
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885812/files/sustainability-12-08225-v2.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885812/files/sustainability-12-08225-v2.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:885812
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL : 2018
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|f 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-01-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-01-15
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21