% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Quoilin:885843,
      author       = {Quoilin, Caroline and Dricot, Laurence and Genon, Sarah and
                      de Timary, Philippe and Duque, Julie},
      title        = {{N}eural bases of inhibitory control: {C}ombining
                      transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetic resonance
                      imaging in alcohol-use disorder patients},
      journal      = {NeuroImage},
      volume       = {224},
      issn         = {1053-8119},
      address      = {Orlando, Fla.},
      publisher    = {Academic Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04129},
      pages        = {117435},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Inhibitory control underlies the ability to inhibit
                      inappropriate responses and involves processes that suppress
                      motor excitability. Such motor modulatory effect has been
                      largely described during action preparation but very little
                      is known about the neural circuit responsible for its
                      implementation. Here, we addressed this point by studying
                      the degree to which the extent of preparatory suppression
                      relates to brain morphometry. We investigated this
                      relationship in patients suffering from severe alcohol use
                      disorder (AUD) because this population displays an
                      inconsistent level of preparatory suppression and major
                      structural brain damage, making it a suitable sample to
                      measure such link. To do so, 45 detoxified patients
                      underwent a structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and
                      performed a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
                      experiment, in which the degree of preparatory suppression
                      was quantified. Besides, behavioral inhibition and trait
                      impulsivity were evaluated in all participants. Overall,
                      whole-brain analyses revealed that a weaker preparatory
                      suppression was associated with a decrease in cortical
                      thickness of a medial prefrontal cluster, encompassing parts
                      of the anterior cingulate cortex and superior-frontal gyrus.
                      In addition, a negative association was observed between the
                      thickness of the supplementary area (SMA)/pre-SMA and
                      behavioral inhibition abilities. Finally, we did not find
                      any significant correlation between preparatory suppression,
                      behavioral inhibition and trait impulsivity, indicating that
                      they represent different facets of inhibitory control.
                      Altogether, the current study provides important insight on
                      the neural regions underlying preparatory suppression and
                      allows highlighting that the excitability of the motor
                      system represents a valuable read-out of upstream cognitive
                      processes.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:33039622},
      UT           = {WOS:000600796800048},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117435},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885843},
}