% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Boomsma:885845,
      author       = {Boomsma, Christine and ter Mors, Emma and Jack, Corin and
                      Broecks, Kevin and Buzoianu, Corina and Cismaru, Diana M.
                      and Peuchen, Ruben and Piek, Pim and Schumann, Diana and
                      Shackley, Simon and Werker, Jasmin},
      title        = {{C}ommunity compensation in the context of {C}arbon
                      {C}apture and {S}torage: {C}urrent debates and practices},
      journal      = {International journal of greenhouse gas control},
      volume       = {101},
      issn         = {1750-5836},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04131},
      pages        = {103128 - 103128},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Societal opposition has the potential to slow down the
                      implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). One of
                      the difficulties is that the perceived benefits associated
                      with a CCS facility for local communities tend to be low
                      compared to its perceived burdens. As is the case for other
                      low carbon technologies, community compensation (or
                      community benefits) has been suggested as a way to restore
                      this perceived imbalance. A diverse literature has looked
                      into the role of community compensation across various land
                      uses and research fields. Synthesis is limited, while at the
                      same time, the provision of community compensation in
                      practice is moving from an ad hoc to a more
                      institutionalized approach. Therefore, it is important to
                      take stock of the literature. This paper provides a review
                      of the community compensation literature in the form of four
                      debates, drawing together environmental social science
                      research on different low carbon technologies (e.g. CCS,
                      renewable energy). In addition, current practices in
                      community compensation for four European countries are
                      discussed. The two parts of this paper are brought together
                      in a set of lessons for the provision of community
                      compensation for future CCS projects; in turn, suggestions
                      for further research are made to address remaining knowledge
                      gaps.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000576963000003},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103128},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/885845},
}