000886001 001__ 886001
000886001 005__ 20210628225835.0
000886001 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/frwa.2020.00026
000886001 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26039
000886001 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:89353247
000886001 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000659473600001
000886001 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04223
000886001 082__ $$a333.7
000886001 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNasta, Paolo$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000886001 245__ $$aIntegrating Invasive and Non-invasive Monitoring Sensors to Detect Field-Scale Soil Hydrological Behavior
000886001 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2020
000886001 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000886001 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000886001 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1604476694_19873
000886001 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000886001 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000886001 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000886001 520__ $$aIn recent decades, while great emphasis has been given to the monitoring of point-scale soil moisture patterns and field-scale integrated soil moisture, the measurement of matric potential has attracted little attention. Information on the soil matric potential is available in point-scale measurements but is still missing at field-scale. This state variable is necessary to understand hydrological fluxes and to determine the soil water retention function (WRF) for field-scale applications. In this study, we combine data from cosmic-ray neutron probes (CRNP, non-invasive proximal soil moisture sensors) and SoilNet wireless sensor networks (invasive ground-based soil moisture and matric potential sensors) installed in two sub-catchments with contrasting land-use (agroforestry vs. near-natural forest) to derive a field-scale WRF. We investigate the hypothesis that both sensor types provide effective measurements that are representative for the entire sub-catchment, as well as the drawbacks of integrating the different measurement scales of the sensor types (i.e., spatial-mean of distributed point-scale data vs. an integrated field-scale measurement). We found discrepancies in the data of the two sensor types related to the effects of the time-varying vertical measurement footprint of the CRNP, which induces a scale mismatch between CRNP-based soil moisture (referring mostly to near-surface depths) and the spatially averaged soil matric potential data measured at soil depths of 0.15 and 0.30 m. To remove the offsets, we opted to use the soil moisture index (SMI) based on the estimation of field capacity and wilting point, retrieved from the knowledge of the field-scale WRF. We found that the bimodality of SMI calculated with SoilNet-based soil moisture induced by Mediterranean rainfall seasonal behavior is not well-captured by CRNP-based soil moisture, except in a particularly dry year like 2017. The contrasts in SMI values between the two test sites were associated with differences in the spatial variability of soil moisture patterns explained by soil texture or terrain characteristics. We argue that field-scale WRFs are useful for the analysis of hydrological processes at the sub-catchment (field) scale and the application of distributed models.
000886001 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000886001 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000886001 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aBogena, Heye$$b1
000886001 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSica, Benedetto$$b2
000886001 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129555$$aWeuthen, Ansgar$$b3$$ufzj
000886001 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b4$$ufzj
000886001 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRomano, Nunzio$$b5
000886001 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2986721-6$$a10.3389/frwa.2020.00026$$gVol. 2, p. 26$$p26$$tFrontiers in water$$v2$$x2624-9375$$y2020
000886001 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/886001/files/FRWA_Nasta%20et%20al._2020.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000886001 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/886001/files/FRWA_Nasta%20et%20al._2020.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000886001 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:886001$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000886001 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000886001 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129555$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000886001 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000886001 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000886001 9141_ $$y2020
000886001 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000886001 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000886001 920__ $$lyes
000886001 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000886001 980__ $$ajournal
000886001 980__ $$aVDB
000886001 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000886001 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000886001 9801_ $$aFullTexts