% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Huang:886003,
author = {Huang, Jingyi and Desai, Ankur R. and Zhu, Jun and
Hartemink, Alfred E. and Stoy, Paul C. and Loheide, Steven
P. and Bogena, Heye and Zhang, Yakun and Zhang, Zhou and
Arriaga, Francisco},
title = {{R}etrieving {H}eterogeneous {S}urface {S}oil {M}oisture at
100 m {A}cross the {G}lobe via {F}usion of {R}emote
{S}ensing and {L}and {S}urface {P}arameters},
journal = {Frontiers in water},
volume = {2},
issn = {2624-9375},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-04225},
pages = {578367},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Successful monitoring of soil moisture dynamics at high
spatio-temporal resolutions globally is hampered by the
heterogeneity of soil hydraulic properties in space and
complex interactions between water and the environmental
variables that control it. Current soil moisture monitoring
schemes via in situ station networks are sparsely
distributed while remote sensing satellite soil moisture
maps have a very coarse spatial resolution. In this study,
an empirical surface soil moisture (SSM) model was
established via fusion of in situ continental and regional
scale soil moisture networks, remote sensing data (SMAP and
Sentinel-1) and high-resolution land surface parameters
(e.g., soil texture, terrain) using a quantile random forest
(QRF) algorithm. The model had a spatial resolution of 100 m
and performed well under cultivated, herbaceous, forest, and
shrub soils (overall R2 = 0.524, RMSE = 0.07 m3 m−3). It
has a relatively good transferability at the regional scale
among different soil moisture networks (mean RMSE =
0.08–0.10 m3 m−3). The global model was applied to map
SSM dynamics at 30–100 m across a field-scale soil
moisture network (TERENO-Wüstebach) and an 80-ha cultivated
cropland in Wisconsin, USA. Without the use of local
training data, the model was able to delineate the
variations in SSM at the field scale but contained large
bias. With the addition of $10\%$ local training datasets
(“spiking”), the bias of the model was significantly
reduced. The QRF model was relatively insensitive to the
resolution of Sentinel-1 data but was affected by the
resolution and accuracy of soil maps. It was concluded that
the empirical model has the potential to be applied
elsewhere across the globe to map SSM at the regional to
field scales for research and applications. Future research
is required to improve the performance of the model by
incorporating more field-scale soil moisture sensor networks
and assimilation with process-based models.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000659431100001},
doi = {10.3389/frwa.2020.578367},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/886003},
}