% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Colbertaldo:886008,
author = {Colbertaldo, P. and Cerniauskas, S. and Grube, T. and
Robinius, M. and Stolten, D. and Campanari, S.},
title = {{C}lean mobility infrastructure and sector integration in
long-term energy scenarios: {T}he case of {I}taly},
journal = {Renewable $\&$ sustainable energy reviews},
volume = {133},
issn = {1364-0321},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-04229},
pages = {110086 -},
year = {2020},
abstract = {As main contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, power and
transportation are crucial sectors for energy system
decarbonization. Their interaction is expected to increase
significantly: plug-in electric vehicles add a new electric
load, increasing grid demand and potentially requiring
substantial grid upgrade; hydrogen production for fuel cell
electric vehicles or for clean fuels synthesis could exploit
the projected massive power overgeneration by intermittent
and seasonally-dependent renewable sources via
Power-to-Hydrogen.This work investigates the infrastructural
needs involved with a broad diffusion of clean mobility,
adopting a sector integration perspective at the national
scale. The analysis combines a multi-node energy system
balance simulation and a techno-economic assessment of the
infrastructure to deliver energy vectors for mobility. The
article explores the long-term case of Italy, considering a
massive increase of renewable power generation capacity and
investigating different mobility scenarios, where
low-emission vehicles account for $50\%$ of the stock.
First, the model solves the energy balances, integrating the
consumption related to mobility energy vectors and taking
into account power grid constraints. Then, an optimal
infrastructure is identified, composed of both a hydrogen
delivery network and a widespread installation of charging
points.Results show that the infrastructural requirements
bring about investment costs in the range of 43–63 G€.
Lower specific costs are associated with the exclusive
presence of FCEVs, whereas the full reliance on BEVs leads
to the most significant costs. Scenarios that combine FCEVs
and BEVs lie in between, suggesting that the overall power +
mobility system benefits from the presence of both
drivetrain options.},
cin = {IEK-3},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
pnm = {134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000581605600009},
doi = {10.1016/j.rser.2020.110086},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/886008},
}