000887680 001__ 887680
000887680 005__ 20210130010617.0
000887680 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104143
000887680 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0926-9851
000887680 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-1859
000887680 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26106
000887680 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000580644500013
000887680 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04341
000887680 082__ $$a550
000887680 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)180342$$aWang, Haoran$$b0
000887680 245__ $$aPitfalls and refinement of 2D cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography
000887680 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2020
000887680 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000887680 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000887680 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1605011786_20937
000887680 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000887680 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000887680 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000887680 520__ $$aAs the conventional surface ERT method is limited by its low resolution at depth, cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography (CHERT) method is increasingly used in the field of geo-environment and hydrogeology whenever possible. Researches regarding CHERT configurations and some negative effects in this method have been useful in survey planning and data interpretation. Nevertheless, some issues remained to be resolved before a standard guideline can be drawn up for conducting CHERT. The symmetric effect was recently pointed out as a major issue in resistivity tomography involving borehole measurements including both borehole-to-surface and cross-hole methods. Symmetrical artifacts emerge for certain types of electrode configuration, which are often desired for better resolution. In this study, the symmetric effect was further investigated in a general two-hole CHERT layout, which is more frequently used in the field. The influence of symmetric effect is found to manifest when the assumption of boundary condition in the inversion is incorrect. The effect of electrode configuration and inversion scheme was further examined and the extended inversion model was found to be more suitable for CHERT data inversion. In particular, the optimal extended range outside the boreholes on each side was shown to be 0.25 times the borehole depth. To mitigate the symmetric effect, a more practical optimal array was proposed. These new suggestions were further verified by a field example.
000887680 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000887680 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000887680 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLin, Chih-Ping$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000887680 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLiu, Hsin-Chang$$b2
000887680 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1496997-x$$a10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104143$$gVol. 181, p. 104143 -$$p104143 -$$tJournal of applied geophysics$$v181$$x0926-9851$$y2020
000887680 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887680/files/%5B3%5D%20Wang-2020-CHERT-1.pdf$$yRestricted
000887680 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887680/files/20200617ManuscriptCHERT-clean.pdf$$yPublished on 2020-07-09. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-07-09.
000887680 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887680/files/20200617ManuscriptCHERT-clean.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yPublished on 2020-07-09. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-07-09.
000887680 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887680$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000887680 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)180342$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000887680 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000887680 9141_ $$y2020
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-10-13
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2020-10-13$$wger
000887680 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-10-13
000887680 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000887680 980__ $$ajournal
000887680 980__ $$aVDB
000887680 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000887680 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000887680 9801_ $$aFullTexts