000887682 001__ 887682
000887682 005__ 20210104120107.0
000887682 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10584-020-02872-6
000887682 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0165-0009
000887682 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1573-1480
000887682 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26632
000887682 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:91174701
000887682 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000572592300001
000887682 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04343
000887682 082__ $$a550
000887682 1001_ $$00000-0001-7426-5181$$aHuang, Shaochun$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000887682 245__ $$aImpacts of hydrological model calibration on projected hydrological changes under climate change—a multi-model assessment in three large river basins
000887682 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer Science + Business Media B.V$$c2020
000887682 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000887682 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000887682 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1609264997_12842
000887682 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000887682 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000887682 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000887682 520__ $$aThis study aimed to investigate the influence of hydrological model calibration/validation on discharge projections for three large river basins (the Rhine, Upper Mississippi and Upper Yellow). Three hydrological models (HMs), which have been firstly calibrated against the monthly discharge at the outlet of each basin (simple calibration), were re-calibrated against the daily discharge at the outlet and intermediate gauges under contrast climate conditions simultaneously (enhanced calibration). In addition, the models were validated in terms of hydrological indicators of interest (median, low and high flows) as well as actual evapotranspiration in the historical period. The models calibrated using both calibration methods were then driven by the same bias corrected climate projections from five global circulation models (GCMs) under four Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios (RCPs). The hydrological changes of the indicators were represented by the ensemble median, ensemble mean and ensemble weighted means of all combinations of HMs and GCMs under each RCP. The results showed moderate (5–10%) to strong influence (> 10%) of the calibration methods on the ensemble medians/means for the Mississippi, minor to moderate (up to 10%) influence for the Yellow and minor (< 5%) influence for the Rhine. In addition, the enhanced calibration/validation method reduced the shares of uncertainty related to HMs for three indicators in all basins when the strict weighting method was used. It also showed that the successful enhanced calibration had the potential to reduce the uncertainty of hydrological projections, especially when the HM uncertainty was significant after the simple calibration.
000887682 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000887682 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000887682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aShah, Harsh$$b1
000887682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)169794$$aNaz, Bibi S.$$b2
000887682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aShrestha, Narayan$$b3
000887682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMishra, Vimal$$b4
000887682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDaggupati, Prasad$$b5
000887682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGhimire, Uttam$$b6
000887682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVetter, Tobias$$b7
000887682 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1477652-2$$a10.1007/s10584-020-02872-6$$p1143–1164$$tClimatic change$$v163$$x1573-1480$$y2020
000887682 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887682/files/Huang2020_Article_ImpactsOfHydrologicalModelCali.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000887682 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887682$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000887682 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)169794$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000887682 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000887682 9141_ $$y2020
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2020-09-08$$wger
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bCLIMATIC CHANGE : 2018$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-08
000887682 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2020-09-08$$wger
000887682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-09-08
000887682 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000887682 980__ $$ajournal
000887682 980__ $$aVDB
000887682 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000887682 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000887682 9801_ $$aFullTexts