001     887686
005     20210130010618.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/jpln.201900308
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0044-3263
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0366-2136
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0372-851X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0372-9702
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0932-6987
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0932-6995
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1436-8730
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1522-2624
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26101
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000508762700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-04347
082 _ _ |a 640
100 1 _ |a Zhao, Yi
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)174040
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Intensive organic vegetable production increases soil organic carbon but with a lower carbon conversion efficiency than integrated management
260 _ _ |a Weinheim
|c 2020
|b Wiley-VCH
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1604935445_20064
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Intensive vegetable production in greenhouses has rapidly expanded in China since the 1990s and increased to 1.3 million ha of farmland by 2016, which is the highest in the world. We conducted an 11‐year greenhouse vegetable production experiment from 2002 to 2013 to observe soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics under three management systems, i.e., conventional (CON), integrated (ING), and intensive organic (ORG) farming. Soil samples (0–20 and 20–40 cm depth) were collected in 2002 and 2013 and separated into four particle‐size fractions, i.e., coarse sand (> 250 µm), fine sand (250–53 µm), silt (53–2 µm), and clay (< 2 µm). The SOC contents and δ13C values of the whole soil and the four particle‐size fractions were analyzed. After 11 years of vegetable farming, ORG and ING significantly increased SOC stocks (0–20 cm) by 4008 ± 36.6 and 2880 ± 365 kg C ha−1 y−1, respectively, 8.1‐ and 5.8‐times that of CON (494 ± 42.6 kg C ha−1 y−1). The SOC stock increase in ORG at 20–40 cm depth was 245 ± 66.4 kg C ha−1 y−1, significantly higher than in ING (66 ± 13.4 kg C ha−1 y−1) and CON (109 ± 44.8 kg C ha−1 y−1). Analyses of 13C revealed a significant increase in newly produced SOC in both soil layers in ORG. However, the carbon conversion efficiency (CE: increased organic carbon in soil divided by organic carbon input) was lower in ORG (14.4%–21.7%) than in ING (18.2%–27.4%). Among the four particle‐sizes in the 0–20 cm layer, the silt fraction exhibited the largest proportion of increase in SOC content (57.8% and 55.4% of the SOC increase in ORG and ING, respectively). A similar trend was detected in the 20–40 cm soil layer. Over all, intensive organic (ORG) vegetable production increases soil organic carbon but with a lower carbon conversion efficiency than integrated (ING) management.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Wu, Shuxia
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Bol, Roland
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Bughio, Mansoor Ahmed
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Wu, Wenliang
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Hu, Yecui
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Meng, Fanqiao
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/jpln.201900308
|g Vol. 183, no. 2, p. 155 - 168
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1481142-x
|n 2
|p 155 - 168
|t Journal of plant nutrition and soil science
|v 183
|y 2020
|x 1436-8730
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887686/files/_ZHAO%20YI%20article%20JPNSS.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887686
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)174040
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145865
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2020-10-11
|w ger
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC : 2018
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-10-11
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-10-11
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-10-11
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21