Home > Publications database > Weather-Based Predictive Modeling of Wheat Stripe Rust Infection in Morocco > print |
001 | 887699 | ||
005 | 20210130010621.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3390/agronomy10020280 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/26116 |2 Handle |
024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:76200763 |2 altmetric |
024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000521366400120 |2 WOS |
037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2020-04356 |
082 | _ | _ | |a 640 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a El Jarroudi, Moussa |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
245 | _ | _ | |a Weather-Based Predictive Modeling of Wheat Stripe Rust Infection in Morocco |
260 | _ | _ | |a Basel |c 2020 |b MDPI |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1605097379_23956 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a Predicting infections by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, with sufficient lead times, helps determine whether fungicide sprays should be applied in order to prevent the risk of wheat stripe rust (WSR) epidemics that might otherwise lead to yield loss. Despite the increasing threat of WSR to wheat production in Morocco, a model for predicting WSR infection events has yet to be developed. In this study, data collected during two consecutive cropping seasons in 2018–2019 in bread and durum wheat fields at nine representative sites (98 and 99 fields in 2018 and 2019, respectively) were used to develop a weather-based model for predicting infections by P. striiformis. Varying levels of WSR incidence and severity were observed according to the site, year, and wheat species. A combined effect of relative humidity > 90%, rainfall ≤ 0.1 mm, and temperature ranging from 8 to 16 °C for a minimum of 4 continuous hours (with the week having these conditions for 5% to 10% of the time) during March–May were optimum to the development of WSR epidemics. Using the weather-based model, WSR infections were satisfactorily predicted, with probabilities of detection ≥ 0.92, critical success index ranging from 0.68 to 0.87, and false alarm ratio ranging from 0.10 to 0.32. Our findings could serve as a basis for developing a decision support tool for guiding on-farm WSR disease management, which could help ensure a sustainable and environmentally friendly wheat production in Morocco |
536 | _ | _ | |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |c POF3-255 |f POF III |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Lahlali, Rachid |0 0000-0002-1299-5733 |b 1 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Kouadio, Louis |0 0000-0001-9669-7807 |b 2 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Denis, Antoine |0 0000-0002-3245-7131 |b 3 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Belleflamme, Alexandre |0 P:(DE-Juel1)179108 |b 4 |u fzj |
700 | 1 | _ | |a El Jarroudi, Mustapha |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Boulif, Mohammed |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 6 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Mahyou, Hamid |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Tychon, Bernard |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 8 |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3390/agronomy10020280 |g Vol. 10, no. 2, p. 280 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2607043-1 |n 2 |p 280 - |t Agronomy |v 10 |y 2020 |x 2073-4395 |
856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887699/files/agronomy-10-00280.pdf |
856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887699/files/agronomy-10-00280.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887699 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB:Earth_Environment |p VDB |p dnbdelivery |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)179108 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2020 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b AGRONOMY-BASEL : 2018 |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2020-08-32 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2020-08-32 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|