Home > Publications database > Towards the representation of groundwater in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator > print

001     887702
005     20210130010622.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/hyp.13767
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0885-6087
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1099-1085
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26118
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:79325095
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000526174200001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-04359
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Batelis, Stamatis‐Christos
|0 0000-0002-9770-4738
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Towards the representation of groundwater in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2020
|b Wiley
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1605098773_27800
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Groundwater is an important component of the hydrological cycle with significant interactions with soil hydrological processes. Recent studies have demonstrated that incorporating groundwater hydrology in land surface models (LSMs) considerably improves the prediction of the partitioning of water components (e.g., runoff and evapotranspiration) at the land surface. However, the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), an LSM developed in the United Kingdom, does not yet have an explicit representation of groundwater. We propose an implementation of a simplified groundwater flow boundary parameterization (JULES‐GFB), which replaces the original free drainage assumption in the default model (JULES‐FD). We tested the two approaches under a controlled environment for various soil types using two synthetic experiments: (1) single‐column and (2) tilted‐V catchment, using a three‐dimensional (3‐D) hydrological model (ParFlow) as a benchmark for JULES’ performance. In addition, we applied our new JULES‐GFB model to a regional domain in the UK, where groundwater is the key element for runoff generation. In the single‐column infiltration experiment, JULES‐GFB showed improved soil moisture dynamics in comparison with JULES‐FD, for almost all soil types (except coarse soils) under a variety of initial water table depths. In the tilted‐V catchment experiment, JULES‐GFB successfully represented the dynamics and the magnitude of saturated and unsaturated storage against the benchmark. The lateral water flow produced by JULES‐GFB was about 50% of what was produced by the benchmark, while JULES‐FD completely ignores this process. In the regional domain application, the Kling‐Gupta efficiency (KGE) for the total runoff simulation showed an average improvement from 0.25 for JULES‐FD to 0.75 for JULES‐GFB. The mean bias of actual evapotranspiration relative to the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM) product was improved from −0.22 to −0.01 mm day−1. Our new JULES‐GFB implementation provides an opportunity to better understand the interactions between the subsurface and land surface processes that are dominated by groundwater hydrology.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Rahman, Mostaquimur
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Kollet, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)151405
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Woods, Ross
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Rosolem, Rafael
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/hyp.13767
|g Vol. 34, no. 13, p. 2843 - 2863
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1479953-4
|n 13
|p 2843 - 2863
|t Hydrological processes
|v 34
|y 2020
|x 1099-1085
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887702/files/hyp.13767.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887702/files/hyp.13767.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887702
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)151405
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-29
|w ger
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b HYDROL PROCESS : 2018
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-08-29
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-29
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-08-29
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21