000887704 001__ 887704
000887704 005__ 20210130010623.0
000887704 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/f11040377
000887704 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26120
000887704 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000534632500015
000887704 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04361
000887704 082__ $$a690
000887704 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)176872$$aZhuang, Liyan$$b0
000887704 245__ $$aNitrogen Additions Retard Nutrient Release from Two Contrasting Foliar Litters in a Subtropical Forest, Southwest China
000887704 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2020
000887704 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000887704 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000887704 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1605099399_29743
000887704 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000887704 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000887704 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000887704 520__ $$aLitter decomposition plays a critical role in regulating biogeochemical cycles in terrestrial ecosystems and is profoundly impacted by increasing atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition. Here, a N manipulation experiment was conducted to explore the effects of N additions (0 kg N ha−1 yr−1, 20 kg N ha−1 yr−1 and 40 kg N ha−1 yr−1) on decay rates and nutrients release of two contrasting species, the evergreen and nutrient-poor Michelia wilsonii and the deciduous and nutrient-rich Camptotheca acuminata, using a litterbag approach at the western edge of the Sichuan Basin of China. The decay rate and the mineralization of N and phosphorus (P) was faster in nutrient-rich C. acuminata litter than in nutrient-poor M. wilsonii litter, regardless of N regimes. N additions tended to decrease the decay constant (k value) in M. wilsonii litter, but had no effect on C. acuminata litter. N additions had no significant effects on carbon (C) release of both litter types. N additions showed negative effects on N and P release of M. wilsonii litter, particularly in the late decomposition stage. Moreover, for C. acuminata litter, N additions did not affect N release, but retarded P release in the late stage. N additions did not affect the C:N ratio in both litter types. However, N additions—especially high-N addition treatments—tended to reduce C:P and N:P ratios in both species. The effect of N addition on N and P remaining was stronger in M. wilsonii litter than in C. acuminata litter. The results of this study indicate that N additions retarded the nutrients release of two foliar litters. Thus, rising N deposition might favor the retention of N and P via litter decomposition in this specific area experiencing significant N deposition.
000887704 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000887704 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000887704 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLiu, Qun$$b1
000887704 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)186703$$aLiang, Ziyi$$b2
000887704 7001_ $$00000-0002-7033-4773$$aYou, Chengming$$b3
000887704 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTan, Bo$$b4
000887704 7001_ $$aZhang, Li$$b5
000887704 7001_ $$00000-0002-4580-1317$$aYin, Rui$$b6
000887704 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aYang, Kaijun$$b7
000887704 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aBol, Roland$$b8
000887704 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aXu, Zhenfeng$$b9$$eCorresponding author
000887704 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2527081-3$$a10.3390/f11040377$$gVol. 11, no. 4, p. 377 -$$n4$$p377 -$$tForests$$v11$$x1999-4907$$y2020
000887704 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887704/files/forests-11-00377.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000887704 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887704$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000887704 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)176872$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000887704 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)186703$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000887704 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145865$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b8$$kFZJ
000887704 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000887704 9141_ $$y2020
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFORESTS : 2018$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-08-25
000887704 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-08-25
000887704 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000887704 980__ $$ajournal
000887704 980__ $$aVDB
000887704 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000887704 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000887704 9801_ $$aFullTexts