% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Lahnakoski:887722,
      author       = {Lahnakoski, Juha M. and Forbes, Paul A. G. and McCall, Cade
                      and Schilbach, Leonhard},
      title        = {{U}nobtrusive tracking of interpersonal orienting and
                      distance predicts the subjective quality of social
                      interactions},
      journal      = {Royal Society Open Science},
      volume       = {7},
      number       = {8},
      issn         = {2054-5703},
      address      = {London},
      publisher    = {Royal Soc. Publ.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04379},
      pages        = {191815 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Interpersonal coordination of behaviour is essential
                      forsmooth social interactions. Measures of interpersonal
                      behaviour,however, often rely on subjective evaluations,
                      invasivemeasurement techniques or gross measures of motion.
                      Here,we constructed an unobtrusive motion tracking system
                      thatenables detailed analysis of behaviour at the individual
                      andinterpersonal levels, which we validated using
                      wearablesensors. We evaluate dyadic measures of joint
                      orienting anddistancing, synchrony and gaze behaviours to
                      summarize datacollected during natural conversation and
                      joint action tasks.Our results demonstrate that patterns of
                      proxemic behaviours,rather than more widely used measures of
                      interpersonalsynchrony, best predicted the subjective
                      quality of theinteractions. Increased distance between
                      participants predictedlower enjoyment, while increased joint
                      orienting towards eachother during cooperation correlated
                      with increased effortreported by the participants.
                      Importantly, the interpersonaldistance was most informative
                      of the quality of interactionwhen task demands and
                      experimental control were minimal.gathered during minimally
                      constrained social interactions are particularly sensitive
                      for the subjectivequality of social interactions and may be
                      useful for interaction-based phenotyping for further
                      studies.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {600},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32968493},
      UT           = {WOS:000562696400001},
      doi          = {10.1098/rsos.191815},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887722},
}