Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Unobtrusive tracking of interpersonal orienting and distance predicts the subjective quality of social interactions > print |
001 | 887722 | ||
005 | 20210130010629.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1098/rsos.191815 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/26140 |2 Handle |
024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:88178479 |2 altmetric |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:32968493 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000562696400001 |2 WOS |
037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2020-04379 |
082 | _ | _ | |a 600 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Lahnakoski, Juha M. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)179423 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
245 | _ | _ | |a Unobtrusive tracking of interpersonal orienting and distance predicts the subjective quality of social interactions |
260 | _ | _ | |a London |c 2020 |b Royal Soc. Publ. |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1605277125_16533 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a Interpersonal coordination of behaviour is essential forsmooth social interactions. Measures of interpersonal behaviour,however, often rely on subjective evaluations, invasivemeasurement techniques or gross measures of motion. Here,we constructed an unobtrusive motion tracking system thatenables detailed analysis of behaviour at the individual andinterpersonal levels, which we validated using wearablesensors. We evaluate dyadic measures of joint orienting anddistancing, synchrony and gaze behaviours to summarize datacollected during natural conversation and joint action tasks.Our results demonstrate that patterns of proxemic behaviours,rather than more widely used measures of interpersonalsynchrony, best predicted the subjective quality of theinteractions. Increased distance between participants predictedlower enjoyment, while increased joint orienting towards eachother during cooperation correlated with increased effortreported by the participants. Importantly, the interpersonaldistance was most informative of the quality of interactionwhen task demands and experimental control were minimal.gathered during minimally constrained social interactions are particularly sensitive for the subjectivequality of social interactions and may be useful for interaction-based phenotyping for further studies. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |c POF3-572 |f POF III |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Forbes, Paul A. G. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a McCall, Cade |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Schilbach, Leonhard |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1098/rsos.191815 |g Vol. 7, no. 8, p. 191815 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2787755-3 |n 8 |p 191815 - |t Royal Society Open Science |v 7 |y 2020 |x 2054-5703 |
856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887722/files/Lahnakoski_et_al_2020_RSOS.pdf |
856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887722/files/Lahnakoski_et_al_2020_RSOS.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887722 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)179423 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v (Dys-)function and Plasticity |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2020 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040 |2 StatID |b Zoological Record |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b ROY SOC OPEN SCI : 2018 |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Open peer review |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1120 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Reviews Reports And Meetings |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a National-Konsortium |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430 |2 StatID |d 2020-09-03 |w ger |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |d 2020-09-03 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2020-09-03 |
920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |k INM-7 |l Gehirn & Verhalten |x 0 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |
980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|