% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lausch:887773,
author = {Lausch, Angela and Schaepman, Michael E. and Skidmore,
Andrew K. and Truckenbrodt, Sina C. and Hacker, Jörg M. and
Baade, Jussi and Bannehr, Lutz and Borg, Erik and Bumberger,
Jan and Dietrich, Peter and Gläßer, Cornelia and Haase,
Dagmar and Heurich, Marco and Jagdhuber, Thomas and Jany,
Sven and Krönert, Rudolf and Möller, Markus and
Mollenhauer, Hannes and Montzka, Carsten and Pause, Marion
and Rogass, Christian and Salepci, Nesrin and Schmullius,
Christiane and Schrodt, Franziska and Schütze, Claudia and
Schweitzer, Christian and Selsam, Peter and Spengler, Daniel
and Vohland, Michael and Volk, Martin and Weber, Ute and
Wellmann, Thilo and Werban, Ulrike and Zacharias, Steffen
and Thiel, Christian},
title = {{L}inking the {R}emote {S}ensing of {G}eodiversity and
{T}raits {R}elevant to {B}iodiversity—{P}art {II}:
{G}eomorphology, {T}errain and {S}urfaces},
journal = {Remote sensing},
volume = {12},
number = {22},
issn = {2072-4292},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-04410},
pages = {3690},
year = {2020},
abstract = {The status, changes, and disturbances in geomorphological
regimes can be regarded as controlling and regulating
factors for biodiversity. Therefore, monitoring
geomorphology at local, regional, and global scales is not
only necessary to conserve geodiversity, but also to
preserve biodiversity, as well as to improve biodiversity
conservation and ecosystem management. Numerous remote
sensing (RS) approaches and platforms have been used in the
past to enable a cost-effective, increasingly freely
available, comprehensive, repetitive, standardized, and
objective monitoring of geomorphological characteristics and
their traits. This contribution provides a state-of-the-art
review for the RS-based monitoring of these characteristics
and traits, by presenting examples of aeolian, fluvial, and
coastal landforms. Different examples for monitoring
geomorphology as a crucial discipline of geodiversity using
RS are provided, discussing the implementation of RS
technologies such as LiDAR, RADAR, as well as multi-spectral
and hyperspectral sensor technologies. Furthermore, data
products and RS technologies that could be used in the
future for monitoring geomorphology are introduced. The use
of spectral traits (ST) and spectral trait variation (STV)
approaches with RS enable the status, changes, and
disturbances of geomorphic diversity to be monitored. We
focus on the requirements for future geomorphology
monitoring specifically aimed at overcoming some key
limitations of ecological modeling, namely: the
implementation and linking of in-situ, close-range, air- and
spaceborne RS technologies, geomorphic traits, and data
science approaches as crucial components for a better
understanding of the geomorphic impacts on complex
ecosystems. This paper aims to impart multidimensional
geomorphic information obtained by RS for improved
utilization in biodiversity monitoring},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000594601500001},
doi = {10.3390/rs12223690},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887773},
}