guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Colloidal iron and organic carbon control soil aggregate formation and stability in arable Luvisols > print |
| Home > Publications database > Colloidal iron and organic carbon control soil aggregate formation and stability in arable Luvisols > print |
| 001 | 887799 | ||
| 005 | 20210130010638.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114421 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0016-7061 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1872-6259 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/26198 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:82244731 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000540257900005 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2020-04429 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 910 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Krause, Lars |0 P:(DE-Juel1)168258 |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Colloidal iron and organic carbon control soil aggregate formation and stability in arable Luvisols |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2020 |b Elsevier Science |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1605625101_5910 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Several beneficial soil functions are linked to aggregates, but how the formation and stability depend on the presence of colloidal- and nanosized (1000–1 nm) bulding blocks is still understood poorly. Here, we sampled subsites from an arable toposequence with 190 and 340 g kg−1 clay, and isolated small soil microaggregates (SMA; <20 µm) from larger macroaggregate units (>250 µm) using an ultrasonic dispersion energy of 60, 250, and 440 J mL−1, respectively. We then allowed these small SMA to reaggregated after chemical removal of organic carbon (OC) as well as of Fe- and Al (hydr)oxides, respectively. The size distribution of the reaggregated small SMA and fine colloids (<0.45 µm) was analyzed via laser diffraction and asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and organic carbon detection, respectively. We found elevated amounts of both finer colloids and stable SMA at subsites with higher clay contents. The size distribution of small SMA was composed of two distinctive fractions including colloids and larger microaggregates with an average size of 5 µm. The removal of Fe with Dithionite-Citrate-Bicarbonate (DCB) shifted the size of the small SMA to a larger equivalent diameter, while removal of OC with NaOCl reduced it. After three wetting and drying cycles, the concentration of colloids declined, whereas the small SMA without chemical pre-treatments reaggregated to particles with larger average diameters up to 10 µm, with the size depending on the clay content. Intriguingly, this gain in size was more pronounced after Fe removal, but it was not affected by OC removal. We suggest that Fe (hydr)oxides impacts the stability of small SMA primarily by being present in small-sized pores and thus cementing the aggregates to smaller size. In contrast, the effect of OC was restricted to the size of colloids, gluing them together to small SMAs within defined size ranges when OC was present but releasing these colloids when OC was absent. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |c POF3-255 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Klumpp, Erwin |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129484 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Nofz, Ines |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Missong, Anna |0 P:(DE-Juel1)159255 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Amelung, Wulf |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129427 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Siebers, Nina |0 P:(DE-Juel1)164361 |b 5 |e Corresponding author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114421 |g Vol. 374, p. 114421 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2001729-7 |p 114421 - |t Geoderma |v 374 |y 2020 |x 0016-7061 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887799/files/Krause%20et%20al_Geoderma_2020_postprint.pdf |y Published on 2020-05-15. Available in OpenAccess from 2022-05-15. |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887799 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB:Earth_Environment |p VDB |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129484 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)159255 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129427 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)164361 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2020 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Embargoed OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b GEODERMA : 2018 |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2020-09-06 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2020-09-06 |w ger |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2020-09-06 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|