000887802 001__ 887802
000887802 005__ 20210130010639.0
000887802 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008162
000887802 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1553-734X
000887802 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1553-7358
000887802 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26158
000887802 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:91824307
000887802 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:32997653
000887802 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000577087300001
000887802 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04432
000887802 082__ $$a610
000887802 1001_ $$00000-0002-9732-6669$$aHenco, Lara$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000887802 245__ $$aAberrant computational mechanisms of social learning and decision-making in schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder
000887802 260__ $$aSan Francisco, Calif.$$bPublic Library of Science$$c2020
000887802 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000887802 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000887802 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1605293118_16530
000887802 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000887802 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000887802 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000887802 520__ $$aPsychiatric disorders are ubiquitously characterized by debilitating social impairments. These difficulties are thought to emerge from aberrant social inference. In order to elucidate the underlying computational mechanisms, patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (N = 29), schizophrenia (N = 31), and borderline personality disorder (N = 31) as well as healthy controls (N = 34) performed a probabilistic reward learning task in which participants could learn from social and non-social information. Patients with schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder performed more poorly on the task than healthy controls and patients with major depressive disorder. Broken down by domain, borderline personality disorder patients performed better in the social compared to the non-social domain. In contrast, controls and major depressive disorder patients showed the opposite pattern and schizophrenia patients showed no difference between domains. In effect, borderline personality disorder patients gave up a possible overall performance advantage by concentrating their learning in the social at the expense of the non-social domain. We used computational modeling to assess learning and decision-making parameters estimated for each participant from their behavior. This enabled additional insights into the underlying learning and decision-making mechanisms. Patients with borderline personality disorder showed slower learning from social and non-social information and an exaggerated sensitivity to changes in environmental volatility, both in the non-social and the social domain, but more so in the latter. Regarding decision-making the modeling revealed that compared to controls and major depression patients, patients with borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia showed a stronger reliance on social relative to non-social information when making choices. Depressed patients did not differ significantly from controls in this respect. Overall, our results are consistent with the notion of a general interpersonal hypersensitivity in borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia based on a shared computational mechanism characterized by an over-reliance on beliefs about others in making decisions and by an exaggerated need to make sense of others during learning specifically in borderline personality disorder.Author summaryPeople suffering from psychiatric disorders frequently experience difficulties in social interaction, such as an impaired ability to use social signals to build representations of others and use these to guide behavior. Compuational models of learning and decision-making enable the characterization of individual patterns in learning and decision-making mechanisms that may be disorder-specific or disorder-general. We employed this approach to investigate the behavior of healthy participants and patients diagnosed with depression, schizophrenia, and borderline personality disorder while they performed a probabilistic reward learning task which included a social component. Patients with schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder performed more poorly on the task than controls and depressed patients. In addition, patients with borderline personality disorder concentrated their learning efforts more on the social compared to the non-social information. Computational modeling additionally revealed that borderline personality disorder patients showed a reduced flexibility in the weighting of newly obtained social and non-social information when learning about their predictive value. Instead, we found exaggerated learning of the volatility of social and non-social information. Additionally, we found a pattern shared between patients with borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia who both showed an over-reliance on predictions about social information during decision-making. Our modeling therefore provides a computational account of the exaggerated need to make sense of and rely on one’s interpretation of others’ behavior, which is prominent
000887802 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000887802 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$a574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)$$cPOF3-574$$fPOF III$$x1
000887802 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0002-3633-9757$$aDiaconescu, Andreea O.$$b1
000887802 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)179423$$aLahnakoski, Juha M.$$b2
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0001-5283-2317$$aBrandi, Marie-Luise$$b3
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0003-3205-7426$$aHörmann, Sophia$$b4
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0003-3259-7991$$aHennings, Johannes$$b5
000887802 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHasan, Alkomiet$$b6
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0001-8265-788X$$aPapazova, Irina$$b7
000887802 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aStrube, Wolfgang$$b8
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0001-9656-8685$$aBolis, Dimitris$$b9
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0001-5547-8309$$aSchilbach, Leonhard$$b10
000887802 7001_ $$00000-0003-4079-5453$$aMathys, Christoph$$b11
000887802 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2193340-6$$a10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008162$$gVol. 16, no. 9, p. e1008162 -$$n9$$pe1008162 -$$tPLoS Computational Biology$$v16$$x1553-7358$$y2020
000887802 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887802/files/journal.pcbi.1008162.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000887802 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887802$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000887802 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)179423$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000887802 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000887802 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vTheory, modelling and simulation$$x1
000887802 9141_ $$y2020
000887802 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPLOS COMPUT BIOL : 2018$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2020-08-32
000887802 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-08-32
000887802 920__ $$lyes
000887802 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000887802 980__ $$ajournal
000887802 980__ $$aVDB
000887802 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000887802 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
000887802 9801_ $$aFullTexts