000887895 001__ 887895
000887895 005__ 20210130010705.0
000887895 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fpls.2020.00387
000887895 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26187
000887895 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:79836002
000887895 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:32346381
000887895 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000530316400001
000887895 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04501
000887895 082__ $$a570
000887895 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKübert, Angelika$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000887895 245__ $$aWater Stable Isotopes in Ecohydrological Field Research: Comparison Between In Situ and Destructive Monitoring Methods to Determine Soil Water Isotopic Signatures
000887895 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Media$$c2020
000887895 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000887895 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000887895 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1605607283_28371
000887895 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000887895 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000887895 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000887895 520__ $$aEcohydrological isotope based field research is often constrained by a lack of temporally explicit soil water data, usually related to the choice of destructive sampling in the field and subsequent analysis in the laboratory. New techniques based on gas permeable membranes allow to sample soil water vapor in situ and infer soil liquid water isotopic signatures. Here, a membrane-based in situ soil water vapor sampling method was tested at a grassland site in Freiburg, Germany. It was further compared with two commonly used destructive sampling approaches for determination of soil liquid water isotopic signatures: cryogenic vacuum extraction and centrifugation. All methods were tested under semi-controlled field conditions, conducting an experiment with dry-wet cycling and two isotopically different labeling irrigation waters. We found mean absolute differences between cryogenic vacuum extraction and in situ vapor measurements of 0.3–14.2‰ (δ18O) and 0.4–152.2‰ (δ2H) for soil liquid water. The smallest differences were found under natural abundance conditions of 2H and 18O, the strongest differences were observed after irrigation with labeled waters. Labeling strongly increased the isotopic variation in soil water: Mean soil water isotopic signatures derived by cryogenic vacuum extraction were -11.6 ± 10.9‰ (δ18O) and +61.9 ± 266.3‰ (δ2H). The in situ soil water vapor method showed isotopic signatures of -12.5 ± 9.4‰ (δ18O) and +169.3 ± 261.5‰ (δ2H). Centrifugation was unsuccessful for soil samples due to low water recovery rates. It is therefore not recommended. Our study highlights that the in situ soil water vapor method captures the temporal dynamics in the isotopic signature of soil water well while the destructive approach also includes the natural lateral isotopic heterogeneity. The different advantages and limitations of the three methods regarding setup, handling and costs are discussed. The choice of method should not only consider prevailing environmental conditions but the experimental design and goal. We see a very promising tool in the in situ soil water vapor method, capturing both temporal developments and spatial variability of soil water processes.
000887895 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000887895 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000887895 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPaulus, Sinikka$$b1
000887895 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDahlmann, Adrian$$b2
000887895 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWerner, Christiane$$b3
000887895 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145658$$aRothfuss, Youri$$b4
000887895 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aOrlowski, Natalie$$b5
000887895 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDubbert, Maren$$b6
000887895 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2613694-6$$a10.3389/fpls.2020.00387$$p387$$tFrontiers in plant science$$v11$$x1664-462X$$y2020
000887895 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887895/files/fpls-11-00387.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000887895 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:887895$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000887895 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145658$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000887895 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000887895 9141_ $$y2020
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT PLANT SCI : 2018$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2020-08-23
000887895 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-08-23
000887895 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000887895 980__ $$ajournal
000887895 980__ $$aVDB
000887895 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000887895 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000887895 9801_ $$aFullTexts