% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Deckmyn:887972,
      author       = {Deckmyn, Gaby and Flores, Omar and Mayer, Mathias and
                      Domene, Xavier and Schnepf, Andrea and Kuka, Katrin and Van
                      Looy, Kris and Rasse, Daniel P. and Briones, Maria J. I. and
                      Barot, Sébastien and Berg, Matty and Vanguelova, Elena and
                      Ostonen, Ivika and Vereecken, Harry and Suz, Laura M. and
                      Frey, Beat and Frossard, Aline and Tiunov, Alexei and Frouz,
                      Jan and Grebenc, Tine and Öpik, Maarja and Javaux, Mathieu
                      and Uvarov, Alexei and Vindušková, Olga and Henning Krogh,
                      Paul and Franklin, Oskar and Jiménez, Juan and Curiel
                      Yuste, Jorge},
      title        = {{KEYLINK}: towards a more integrative soil representation
                      for inclusion in ecosystem scale models. {I}. review and
                      model concept},
      journal      = {PeerJ},
      volume       = {8},
      issn         = {2167-8359},
      address      = {London [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {PeerJ, Inc.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04558},
      pages        = {e9750 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {The relatively poor simulation of the below-ground
                      processes is a severe drawback for many ecosystem models,
                      especially when predicting responses to climate change and
                      management. For a meaningful estimation of ecosystem
                      production and the cycling of water, energy, nutrients and
                      carbon, the integration of soil processes and the exchanges
                      at the surface is crucial. It is increasingly recognized
                      that soil biota play an important role in soil organic
                      carbon and nutrient cycling, shaping soil structure and
                      hydrological properties through their activity, and in water
                      and nutrient uptake by plants through mycorrhizal processes.
                      In this article, we review the main soil biological actors
                      (microbiota, fauna and roots) and their effects on soil
                      functioning. We review to what extent they have been
                      included in soil models and propose which of them could be
                      included in ecosystem models. We show that the model
                      representation of the soil food web, the impact of soil
                      ecosystem engineers on soil structure and the related
                      effects on hydrology and soil organic matter (SOM)
                      stabilization are key issues in improving ecosystem-scale
                      soil representation in models. Finally, we describe a new
                      core model concept (KEYLINK) that integrates insights from
                      SOM models, structural models and food web models to
                      simulate the living soil at an ecosystem scale.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
                      (POF3-255)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32974092},
      UT           = {WOS:000567264100001},
      doi          = {10.7717/peerj.9750},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/887972},
}