% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{RoblesAguilar:888083,
      author       = {Robles-Aguilar, Ana A. and Grunert, Oliver and
                      Hernandez-Sanabria, Emma and Mysara, Mohamed and Meers, Erik
                      and Boon, Nico and Jablonowski, Nicolai D.},
      title        = {{E}ffect of {A}pplying {S}truvite and {O}rganic {N} as
                      {R}ecovered {F}ertilizers on the {R}hizosphere {D}ynamics
                      and {C}ultivation of {L}upine ({L}upinus angustifolius)},
      journal      = {Frontiers in plant science},
      volume       = {11},
      issn         = {1664-462X},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Media},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04660},
      pages        = {572741},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Intensive agriculture and horticulture heavily rely on the
                      input of fertilizers to sustain food (and feed) production.
                      However, high carbon footprint and pollution are associated
                      with the mining processes of P and K, and the artificial
                      nitrogen fixation for the production of synthetic
                      fertilizers. Organic fertilizers or recovered nutrients from
                      different waste sources can be used to reduce the
                      environmental impact of fertilizers. We tested two recovered
                      nutrients with slow-release patterns as promising
                      alternatives for synthetic fertilizers: struvite and a
                      commercially available organic fertilizer. Using these
                      fertilizers as a nitrogen source, we conducted a rhizotron
                      experiment to test their effect on plant performance and
                      nutrient recovery in lupine plants. Plant performance was
                      not affected by the fertilizer applied; however, N recovery
                      was higher from the organic fertilizer than from struvite.
                      As root architecture is fundamental for plant productivity,
                      variations in root structure and length as a result of soil
                      nutrient availability driven by plant–bacteria
                      interactions were compared showing also no differences
                      between fertilizers. However, fertilized plants were
                      considerably different in the root length and morphology
                      compared with the no fertilized plants. Since the microbial
                      community influences plant nitrogen availability, we
                      characterized the root-associated microbial community
                      structure and functionality. Analyses revealed that the
                      fertilizer applied had a significant impact on the
                      associations and functionality of the bacteria inhabiting
                      the growing medium used. The type of fertilizer
                      significantly influenced the interindividual dissimilarities
                      in the most abundant genera between treatments. This means
                      that different plant species have a distinct effect on
                      modulating the associated microbial community, but in the
                      case of lupine, the fertilizer had a bigger effect than the
                      plant itself. These novel insights on interactions between
                      recovered fertilizers, plant, and associated microbes can
                      contribute to developing sustainable crop production
                      systems.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {33329631},
      UT           = {WOS:000595120800001},
      doi          = {10.3389/fpls.2020.572741},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888083},
}