% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Day:888141,
      author       = {Day, Julia K. and McIlvennie, Claire and Brackley, Connor
                      and Tarantini, Mariantonietta and Piselli, Cristina and
                      Hahn, Jakob and O’Brien, William and Rajus, Vinu Subashini
                      and Simone, Marilena De and Kjærgaard, Mikkel Baun and
                      Pritoni, Marco and Schlüter, Arno and Peng, Yuzhen and
                      Schweiker, Marcel and Fajilla, Gianmarco and Becchio,
                      Cristina and Fabi, Valentina and Spigliantini, Giorgia and
                      Derbas, Ghadeer and Pisello, Anna Laura},
      title        = {{A} review of select human-building interfaces and their
                      relationship to human behavior, energy use and occupant
                      comfort.},
      journal      = {Building and environment},
      volume       = {178},
      issn         = {0360-1323},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04715},
      pages        = {106920},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {In recent years, research has emerged to quantitatively and
                      qualitatively understand occupants’ interactions with
                      buildings. However, there has been surprisinglylittle
                      research on building interfaces and how their design,
                      context (e.g., location), and underlying logic impact their
                      usability and occupants’ perceived control, aswell as the
                      resulting comfort and energy performance. Research is needed
                      to better understand how occupants interact with building
                      interfaces in both commercialand residential applications;
                      both applications are important to address as there are many
                      differences in interface types, level of control and
                      understanding, and evenexpectations of engagement. This
                      paper provides a cursory review and discussion of select
                      common building interfaces: windows, window shades/blinds,
                      thermostats,and lighting controls. The goal of this paper is
                      to review literature related to these human-building
                      interfaces to explore interface characteristics,
                      currentdesign and use challenges, and relationships between
                      building interfaces and occupants. Human-building interface
                      interactions are complex, more research is neededto
                      understand design, use, and characteristics. Common themes
                      emerged throughout the literature review to explain occupant
                      interactions (or lack of interactions)with building
                      interfaces, which included thermal and visual comfort, ease
                      and access of control, interface/control placement, poor
                      interface/control design, lack ofunderstanding, and
                      social-behavioral dynamics.},
      cin          = {IAS-7},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321},
      pnm          = {511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
                      (POF3-511) / PhD no Grant - Doktorand ohne besondere
                      Förderung (PHD-NO-GRANT-20170405)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511 / G:(DE-Juel1)PHD-NO-GRANT-20170405},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000540970400009},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106920},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888141},
}