000888228 001__ 888228
000888228 005__ 20210118134449.0
000888228 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s00426-019-01154-w
000888228 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0033-3026
000888228 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0340-0727
000888228 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1430-2772
000888228 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26577
000888228 0247_ $$2pmid$$a30806810
000888228 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000537736200015
000888228 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04777
000888228 041__ $$aEnglish
000888228 082__ $$a150
000888228 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166200$$aMengotti, Paola$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000888228 245__ $$aAge-related changes in Bayesian belief updating during attentional deployment and motor intention
000888228 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2020
000888228 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000888228 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000888228 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1608209384_29745
000888228 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000888228 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000888228 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000888228 520__ $$aPredicting upcoming events using past observations is a crucial component of an efficient allocation of attentional resources. Therefore, the deployment of attention is sensitive to different types of cues predicting upcoming events. Here we investigated probabilistic inference abilities in spatial and feature-based attentional, as well as in motor-intentional subsystems, focusing specifically on the age-related changes in these abilities. In two behavioral experiments, younger and older adults (20 younger and 20 older adults for each experiment) performed three versions of a cueing paradigm, where spatial, feature, or motor cues predicted the location, color, or motor response of a target stimulus. The percentage of cue validity (i.e., the probability of the cue being valid) changed over time, thereby creating a volatile environment. A Bayesian hierarchical model was used to estimate trial-wise beliefs concerning the cue validity from reaction times and to derive a subject-specific belief updating parameter ω in each task version. We also manipulated task difficulty: participants performed an easier version of the task in Experiment 1 and a more difficult version in Experiment 2. Results from Experiment 1 suggested a preserved ability of older adults to use the three different cues to generate predictions. However, the increased task demands of Experiment 2 uncovered a difference in belief updating between the two age groups, indicating moderate evidence for a reduction of the ability to update predictions with motor intention cues in older adults. These results point at a distinction of attentional and motor-intentional subsystems, with age-related differences tackling especially the motor-intentional subsystem
000888228 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000888228 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000888228 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161249$$aKuhns, Anna B.$$b1
000888228 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R.$$b2$$ufzj
000888228 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131745$$aVossel, Simone$$b3
000888228 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1463034-5$$a10.1007/s00426-019-01154-w$$gVol. 84, no. 5, p. 1387 - 1399$$n5$$p1387 - 1399$$tPsychological research$$v84$$x1430-2772$$y2020
000888228 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888228/files/Mengotti_2020_PsyRes_Age-related%20changes%20in%20Bayesian%20..%20post%20print.pdf$$yPublished on 2019-02-26. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-02-26.
000888228 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888228/files/Mengotti_2020_Psychol%20Res_Age-related%20Changes%20In%20Bayesian...-1.pdf$$yRestricted
000888228 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:888228$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000888228 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166200$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000888228 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000888228 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131745$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000888228 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000888228 9141_ $$y2020
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPSYCHOL RES-PSYCH FO : 2018$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2020-09-03$$wger
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-03
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2020-09-03$$wger
000888228 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-09-03
000888228 920__ $$lyes
000888228 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000888228 980__ $$ajournal
000888228 980__ $$aVDB
000888228 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000888228 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000888228 9801_ $$aFullTexts