Home > Publications database > Age-related changes in Bayesian belief updating during attentional deployment and motor intention > print

001     888228
005     20210118134449.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s00426-019-01154-w
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0033-3026
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0340-0727
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1430-2772
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26577
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 30806810
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000537736200015
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-04777
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 150
100 1 _ |a Mengotti, Paola
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166200
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Age-related changes in Bayesian belief updating during attentional deployment and motor intention
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg
|c 2020
|b Springer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1608209384_29745
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Predicting upcoming events using past observations is a crucial component of an efficient allocation of attentional resources. Therefore, the deployment of attention is sensitive to different types of cues predicting upcoming events. Here we investigated probabilistic inference abilities in spatial and feature-based attentional, as well as in motor-intentional subsystems, focusing specifically on the age-related changes in these abilities. In two behavioral experiments, younger and older adults (20 younger and 20 older adults for each experiment) performed three versions of a cueing paradigm, where spatial, feature, or motor cues predicted the location, color, or motor response of a target stimulus. The percentage of cue validity (i.e., the probability of the cue being valid) changed over time, thereby creating a volatile environment. A Bayesian hierarchical model was used to estimate trial-wise beliefs concerning the cue validity from reaction times and to derive a subject-specific belief updating parameter ω in each task version. We also manipulated task difficulty: participants performed an easier version of the task in Experiment 1 and a more difficult version in Experiment 2. Results from Experiment 1 suggested a preserved ability of older adults to use the three different cues to generate predictions. However, the increased task demands of Experiment 2 uncovered a difference in belief updating between the two age groups, indicating moderate evidence for a reduction of the ability to update predictions with motor intention cues in older adults. These results point at a distinction of attentional and motor-intentional subsystems, with age-related differences tackling especially the motor-intentional subsystem
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Kuhns, Anna B.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161249
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Vossel, Simone
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131745
|b 3
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s00426-019-01154-w
|g Vol. 84, no. 5, p. 1387 - 1399
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1463034-5
|n 5
|p 1387 - 1399
|t Psychological research
|v 84
|y 2020
|x 1430-2772
856 4 _ |y Published on 2019-02-26. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-02-26.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888228/files/Mengotti_2020_PsyRes_Age-related%20changes%20in%20Bayesian%20..%20post%20print.pdf
856 4 _ |y Restricted
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888228/files/Mengotti_2020_Psychol%20Res_Age-related%20Changes%20In%20Bayesian...-1.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:888228
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166200
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131745
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PSYCHOL RES-PSYCH FO : 2018
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
|w ger
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-03
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-03
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-03
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21