000888230 001__ 888230
000888230 005__ 20210130010844.0
000888230 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295
000888230 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26297
000888230 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:94921181
000888230 0247_ $$2pmid$$a33324272
000888230 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000597152900001
000888230 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-04779
000888230 041__ $$aEnglish
000888230 082__ $$a150
000888230 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAspé-Sánchez, Mauricio$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000888230 245__ $$aLate Frontal Negativity Discriminates Outcomes and Intentions in Trust-Repayment Behavior
000888230 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Research Foundation$$c2020
000888230 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000888230 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000888230 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1606405219_10009
000888230 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000888230 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000888230 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000888230 520__ $$aAltruism (a costly action that benefits others) and reciprocity (the repayment of acts in kind) differ in that the former expresses preferences about the outcome of a social interaction, whereas the latter requires, in addition, ascribing intentions to others. Interestingly, an individual’s behavior and neurophysiological activity under outcome- versus intention-based interactions has not been compared directly using different endowments in the same subject and during the same session. Here, we used a mixed version of the Dictator and the Investment games, together with electroencephalography, to uncover a subject’s behavior and brain activity when challenged with endowments of different sizes in contexts that call for an altruistic (outcome-based) versus a reciprocal (intention-based) response. We found that subjects displayed positive or negative reciprocity (reciprocal responses greater or smaller than that for altruism, respectively) depending on the amount of trust they received. Furthermore, a subject’s late frontal negativity differed between conditions, predicting responses to trust in intentions-based trials. Finally, brain regions related with mentalizing and cognitive control were the cortical sources of this activity. Thus, our work disentangles the behavioral components present in the repayment of trust, and sheds light on the neural activity underlying the integration of outcomes and perceived intentions in human economic interactions.
000888230 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000888230 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000888230 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166200$$aMengotti, Paola$$b1$$ufzj
000888230 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRumiati, Raffaella$$b2
000888230 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRodríguez-Sickert, Carlos$$b3
000888230 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEwer, John$$b4
000888230 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBilleke, Pablo$$b5
000888230 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2563826-9$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295$$gVol. 11, p. 532295$$p532295$$tFrontiers in psychology$$v11$$x1664-1078$$y2020
000888230 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888230/files/AspeSanchez_2020-Frontiers_in_Psychology_Late%20frontal%20negativity%20....pdf$$yOpenAccess
000888230 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:888230$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000888230 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166200$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000888230 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000888230 9141_ $$y2020
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT PSYCHOL : 2018$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2020-09-11
000888230 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-09-11
000888230 920__ $$lyes
000888230 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000888230 980__ $$ajournal
000888230 980__ $$aVDB
000888230 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000888230 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000888230 9801_ $$aFullTexts