% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{AspSnchez:888230,
      author       = {Aspé-Sánchez, Mauricio and Mengotti, Paola and Rumiati,
                      Raffaella and Rodríguez-Sickert, Carlos and Ewer, John and
                      Billeke, Pablo},
      title        = {{L}ate {F}rontal {N}egativity {D}iscriminates {O}utcomes
                      and {I}ntentions in {T}rust-{R}epayment {B}ehavior},
      journal      = {Frontiers in psychology},
      volume       = {11},
      issn         = {1664-1078},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04779},
      pages        = {532295},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Altruism (a costly action that benefits others) and
                      reciprocity (the repayment of acts in kind) differ in that
                      the former expresses preferences about the outcome of a
                      social interaction, whereas the latter requires, in
                      addition, ascribing intentions to others. Interestingly, an
                      individual’s behavior and neurophysiological activity
                      under outcome- versus intention-based interactions has not
                      been compared directly using different endowments in the
                      same subject and during the same session. Here, we used a
                      mixed version of the Dictator and the Investment games,
                      together with electroencephalography, to uncover a
                      subject’s behavior and brain activity when challenged with
                      endowments of different sizes in contexts that call for an
                      altruistic (outcome-based) versus a reciprocal
                      (intention-based) response. We found that subjects displayed
                      positive or negative reciprocity (reciprocal responses
                      greater or smaller than that for altruism, respectively)
                      depending on the amount of trust they received. Furthermore,
                      a subject’s late frontal negativity differed between
                      conditions, predicting responses to trust in
                      intentions-based trials. Finally, brain regions related with
                      mentalizing and cognitive control were the cortical sources
                      of this activity. Thus, our work disentangles the behavioral
                      components present in the repayment of trust, and sheds
                      light on the neural activity underlying the integration of
                      outcomes and perceived intentions in human economic
                      interactions.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {150},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {33324272},
      UT           = {WOS:000597152900001},
      doi          = {10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888230},
}