% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Hanke:888287,
      author       = {Hanke, Michael and Pestilli, Franco and Wagner, Adina S.
                      and Markiewicz, Christopher J. and Poline, Jean-Baptiste and
                      Halchenko, Yaroslav O.},
      title        = {{I}n defense of decentralized research data management},
      journal      = {Neuroforum},
      volume       = {27},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {0947-0875},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {De Gruyter},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-04813},
      pages        = {17-25},
      year         = {2021},
      note         = {This article was funded by NationalScience Foundation (BMBF
                      01GQ1905; NSF 1912266),European Union’s Horizon 2020 under
                      grant agreementno. 826421 (VirtualBrainCloud), and 945539
                      (HBP SGA3),Microsoft Faculty Fellowship, National Institutes
                      of Health,National Institute of Mental Health under Award
                      NumberR01MH096906, Canada First Research Excellence
                      Fund,Health Canada, Bundesministerium für Bildung
                      undForschung, and National Institute of Biomedical
                      Imagingand Bioengineering.},
      abstract     = {Decentralized research data management (dRDM) systems
                      handle digital research objects across participating nodes
                      without critically relying on central services. We present
                      four perspectives in defense of dRDM, illustrating that, in
                      contrast to centralized or federated research data
                      management solutions, a dRDM system based on heterogeneous
                      but interoperable components can offer a sustainable,
                      resilient, inclusive, and adaptive infrastructure for
                      scientific stakeholders: An individual scientist or
                      laboratory, a research institute, a domain data archive or
                      cloud computing platform, and a collaborative multisite
                      consortium. All perspectives share the use of a common,
                      self-contained, portable data structure as an abstraction
                      from current technology and service choices. In conjunction,
                      the four perspectives review how varying requirements of
                      independent scientific stakeholders can be addressed by a
                      scalable, uniform dRDM solution and present a working system
                      as an exemplary implementation.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {525 - Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction
                      (POF4-525) / VirtualBrainCloud - Personalized
                      Recommendations for Neurodegenerative Disease (826421) / HBP
                      SGA3 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 3
                      (945539)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 / G:(EU-Grant)826421 /
                      G:(EU-Grant)945539},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1515/nf-2020-0037},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888287},
}