% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mller:888454,
author = {Müller, Tamara T. and Lio, Pietro},
title = {{PECLIDES} {N}euro: {A} {P}ersonalisable {C}linical
{D}ecision {S}upport {S}ystem for {N}eurological {D}iseases},
journal = {Frontiers in artificial intelligence},
volume = {3},
issn = {2624-8212},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-04922},
pages = {23},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and
Parkinson's impact millions of people worldwide. Early
diagnosis has proven to greatly increase the chances of
slowing down the diseases' progression. Correct diagnosis
often relies on the analysis of large amounts of patient
data, and thus lends itself well to support from machine
learning algorithms, which are able to learn from past
diagnosis and see clearly through the complex interactions
of a patient's symptoms and data. Unfortunately, many
contemporary machine learning techniques fail to reveal
details about how they reach their conclusions, a property
considered fundamental when providing a diagnosis. Here we
introduce our Personalisable Clinical Decision Support
System (PECLIDES), an algorithmic process formulated to
address this specific fault in diagnosis detection. PECLIDES
provides a clear insight into the decision-making process
leading to a diagnosis, making it a gray box model. Our
algorithm enriches the fundamental work of Masheyekhi and
Gras in data integration, personal medicine, usability,
visualization, and interactivity.Our decision support system
is an operation of translational medicine. It is based on
random forests, is personalisable and allows a clear insight
into the decision-making process. A well-structured rule set
is created and every rule of the decision-making process can
be observed by the user (physician). Furthermore, the user
has an impact on the creation of the final rule set and the
algorithm allows the comparison of different diseases as
well as regional differences in the same disease. The
algorithm is applicable to various decision problems. In
this paper we will evaluate it on diagnosing neurological
diseases and therefore refer to the algorithm as PECLIDES
Neuro1.},
cin = {INM-6 / IAS-6 / INM-10},
ddc = {004},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828 /
I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113},
pnm = {574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:33733142},
UT = {WOS:000751673300023},
doi = {10.3389/frai.2020.00023},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888454},
}