% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schmidt:888584,
      author       = {Schmidt, Claudia C. and Timpert, David C. and Arend, Isabel
                      and Vossel, Simone and Fink, Gereon R. and Henik, Avishai
                      and Weiss, Peter H.},
      title        = {{C}ontrol of response interference: caudate nucleus
                      contributes to selective inhibition},
      journal      = {Scientific reports},
      volume       = {10},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {2045-2322},
      address      = {[London]},
      publisher    = {Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-05040},
      pages        = {20977},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {While the role of cortical regions in cognitive control
                      processes is well accepted, the contribution of subcortical
                      structures (e.g., the striatum), especially to the control
                      of response interference, remains controversial. Therefore,
                      the present study aimed to investigate the cortical and
                      particularly subcortical neural mechanisms of response
                      interference control (including selective inhibition).
                      Thirteen healthy young participants underwent event-related
                      functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a
                      unimanual version of the Simon task. In this task,
                      successful performance required the resolution of
                      stimulus–response conflicts in incongruent trials by
                      selectively inhibiting interfering response tendencies. The
                      behavioral results show an asymmetrical Simon effect that
                      was more pronounced in the contralateral hemifield.
                      Contrasting incongruent trials with congruent trials (i.e.,
                      the overall Simon effect) significantly activated clusters
                      in the right anterior cingulate cortex, the right posterior
                      insula, and the caudate nucleus bilaterally. Furthermore, a
                      region of interest analysis based on previous patient
                      studies revealed that activation in the bilateral caudate
                      nucleus significantly co-varied with a parameter of
                      selective inhibition derived from distributional analyses of
                      response times. Our results corroborate the notion that the
                      cognitive control of response interference is supported by a
                      fronto-striatal circuitry, with a functional contribution of
                      the caudate nucleus to the selective inhibition of
                      interfering response tendencies.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {600},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:33262369},
      UT           = {WOS:000608976100024},
      doi          = {10.1038/s41598-020-77744-1},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888584},
}