001     888671
005     20240712113256.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116270
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0306-2619
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1872-9118
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/26871
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000613285100002
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:104724699
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-05106
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Scheepers, Fabian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166215
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Temperature optimization for improving polymer electrolyte membrane-water electrolysis system efficiency
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1638250402_14457
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Most of the hydrogen produced today is made using fossil fuels, making a significant contribution to global CO$_2$ emissions. Although polymer electrolyte membrane water-electrolyzers can produce green hydrogen by means of excess electricity generated from renewable energy sources, their operation is still not economical. According to industry experts, the necessary cost reductions can be achieved by 2030 if system efficiency can be improved. The commonly stated idea is to improve efficiency by increasing the stack temperature, which requires the development of more resistant materials. This study investigates not only the efficiency of an electrolysis cell, but of the entire electrolysis process, including gas compression of hydrogen. The results indicate that an optimal stack temperature exists for every operating point. It is shown that the optimal temperature depends solely on the electrode pressure and cell voltage and can be analytically calculated. In addition, the temperature optimization leads to significantly reduced hydrogen permeation at low current densities. In combination with the pressure optimization, the challenging safety issues of pressurized electrolysis can be eliminated for the entire load range and, at the same time, the efficiency of the overall system be maximized.
536 _ _ |a 135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|c POF3-135
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 1231 - Electrochemistry for Hydrogen (POF4-123)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1231
|c POF4-123
|f POF IV
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Stähler, Markus
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129930
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Stähler, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132718
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Rauls, Edward
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)177930
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Müller, Martin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129892
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Carmo, Marcelo
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145276
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Lehnert, Werner
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129883
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116270
|g p. 116270 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2000772-3
|p 116270 -
|t Applied energy
|v 283
|y 2021
|x 0306-2619
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888671/files/Invoice_OAD0000086769.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888671/files/1-s2.0-S0306261920316603-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:888671
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166215
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129930
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132718
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177930
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177930
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129892
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145276
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129883
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129883
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Energie
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Fuel Cells
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-123
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Chemische Energieträger
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1231
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2018
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2018
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-11
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
|k IEK-14
|l Elektrochemische Verfahrenstechnik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-4-20191129


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21