% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bre:888780,
author = {Brée, Luisa C. and Bulan, Andreas and Herding, Robert and
Kuhlmann, Jonas and Mitsos, Alexander and Perrey, Karen and
Roh, Kosan},
title = {{T}echno-{E}conomic {C}omparison of {F}lexibility {O}ptions
in {C}hlorine {P}roduction},
journal = {Industrial $\&$ engineering chemistry},
volume = {59},
number = {26},
issn = {1520-5045},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {Soc.75198},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-05209},
pages = {12186 - 12196},
year = {2020},
abstract = {In order to allow demand side management in the chlorine
industry, we suggest seven modifications to the conventional
chlor-alkali process. The modifications include the
oversizing of electrolyzer cells, replacement of electrodes,
and integration with flexible auxiliary units. We optimize
the operation of the processes for four scenarios with
different electricity price profiles and hydrogen prices. We
then rank the processes in a merit order of three economic
metrics including investment costs, operating costs, and
payout time. While reasonable payout times are achieved with
many of the flexible processes, the best option with the
shortest payout time highly depends on the prices of
hydrogen and electricity. The results indicate that flexible
chlor-alkali processes without auxiliary units outperform
steady-state chlor-alkali processes with flexible auxiliary
units. In particular, the combination of two electrodes or
the implementation of a bifunctional electrode for
operational mode switching seems to be the best compromise.},
cin = {IEK-10},
ddc = {660},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000547326800028},
doi = {10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01775},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888780},
}