% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{QuirsVargas:888878,
author = {Quirós-Vargas, Juan and Romanelli, Thiago Libório and
Rascher, Uwe and Agüero, José},
title = {{S}ustainability {P}erformance through {T}echnology
{A}doption: {A} {C}ase {S}tudy of {L}and {L}eveling in a
{P}addy {F}ield},
journal = {Agronomy},
volume = {10},
number = {11},
issn = {2073-4395},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-05283},
pages = {1681 -},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Energy is required in all agricultural activities.
Diagramming material flows needed by crop production systems
supports the proper analysis of energy flows interactions
within a system’s boundaries. The latter complemented with
an economic analysis gives a clear view of how beneficial a
new practice within a crop cycle is—in this case, the
variable slope (VS) land leveling (LL) operation. VS is a
global navigation satellite system (GNSS, with real time
kinematics—RTK—accuracy) LL technique used to create a
smooth continuous surface with a constant slope, by cutting
and filling topsoil layers only in those points presenting
“anomalies” of micro-relief which make the movement of
water difficult. This operation is important for paddy
production since: (i) it enables to crop during dry seasons
by harnessing the water of rivers and wells, and (ii)
improves the production during rainy seasons, by allowing
the farmer to manage the drainage timely and homogeneously.
The present study aims to analyze, from the energy
perspective, the effects of the VS leveling implementation
in a paddy field (located in the Costa Rican Pacific),
throughout input (labor, gas oil, etc.) and output (yield
and price) data of five consecutive years (2011–2015). A
material flow diagram was created representing two
scenarios: before and after leveling the land. The materials
were converted into energy (MJ ha−1) data, used for the
estimation of EROI (energy return on investment), EP (energy
productivity) and EB (energy balance) indices, while looking
for a clearer understanding of the LL impact on the use of
energy within the agroecosystem. Moreover, in order to
complement the energy perspective, an economic point of view
was considered as well through a profitability analysis
where the total gain obtained over the years with LL was
compared with that obtained without LL. Results showed that
the increase in energy consumed by incorporating VS leveling
is compensated by the gradual increase of energy embodied in
yield, increasing energy balance (EB) from 26,192 MJ ha−1
up to 91,166 MJ ha−1. Similarly, EROI and EP were
duplicated with LL. Economic total gain after incorporating
the VS increased from less than 500 USD ha−1 up to 1800
USD ha−1 in the third year after leveling. Yield is more
affected under adverse weather conditions with irregular
water supply, either limited or excessive; and effects are
less pronounced when the yield limiting factor is associated
with biotic stress unrelated to irrigation and drainage
facts. An environmental positive impact should also be
noted, since VS allowed the production benefits of having
highly-efficient irrigation and drainage systems, while
avoiding major damage to topsoil layers.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {640},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000592717100001},
doi = {10.3390/agronomy10111681},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/888878},
}