000889033 001__ 889033
000889033 005__ 20220303144734.0
000889033 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s11104-020-04794-9
000889033 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0032-079X
000889033 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1573-5036
000889033 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/27158
000889033 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:99959713
000889033 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000600828000001
000889033 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-05406
000889033 041__ $$aEnglish
000889033 082__ $$a580
000889033 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNakhforoosh, Alireza$$b0
000889033 245__ $$aDeep soil exploration vs. topsoil exploitation: distinctive rooting strategies between wheat landraces and wild relatives
000889033 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer Science + Business Media B.V$$c2021
000889033 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000889033 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000889033 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1646232360_5184
000889033 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000889033 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000889033 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000889033 520__ $$aAimsDiversity of root systems among genetic resources can contribute to optimize water and nutrient uptake. Topsoil exploitation vs. deep soil exploration represent two contrasting ideotypes in relation to resource use. Our study reveals how rooting patterns changed between wheat wild progenitors and landraces in regard to these ideotypes.MethodsRoot (partitioning, morphology, distribution, elongation, anatomy) and shoot traits (dry-matter, leaf area, assimilation) of durum landraces, wild emmer and wild einkorn from Iran, Syria, Turkey and Lebanon were phenotyped using the GrowScreen-Rhizo platform. Distinctive rooting patterns were identified via principal component analysis and relations with collection site characteristics analyzed.ResultsShoot trait differentiation was strongly driven by seed weight, leading to superior early vigor of landraces. Wild progenitors formed superficial root systems with a higher contribution of lateral and early-emerging nodal axes to total root length. Durum landraces had a root system dominated by seminal axes allocated evenly over depth. Xylem anatomy was the trait most affected by the environmental influence of the collection site.ConclusionsThe durum landrace root system approximated a deep soil exploration ideotype which would optimize subsoil water uptake, while monococcum-type wild einkorn was most similar to a topsoil exploiting strategy with potential competitive advantages for subsistence in natural vegetation.
000889033 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171$$a2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000889033 536__ $$0G:(EU-Grant)768681$$aEPPN - European Network for Pilot Production Facilities and Innovation Hubs (768681)$$c768681$$fH2020-NMBP-CSA-2017$$x1
000889033 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000889033 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129373$$aNagel, Kerstin A.$$b1$$ufzj
000889033 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)143649$$aFiorani, Fabio$$b2$$ufzj
000889033 7001_ $$00000-0001-9813-1364$$aBodner, Gernot$$b3$$eCorresponding author
000889033 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1478535-3$$a10.1007/s11104-020-04794-9$$p397–421$$tPlant and soil$$v459$$x1573-5036$$y2021
000889033 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889033/files/Nakhforoosh2021_Article_DeepSoilExplorationVsTopsoilEx.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000889033 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889033$$pdnbdelivery$$pec_fundedresources$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000889033 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129373$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000889033 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)143649$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000889033 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000889033 9130_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000889033 9141_ $$y2021
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2020-09-05$$wger
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPLANT SOIL : 2018$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium$$d2020-09-05$$wger
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-09-05
000889033 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2020-09-05$$wger
000889033 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-09-05
000889033 920__ $$lyes
000889033 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000889033 980__ $$ajournal
000889033 980__ $$aVDB
000889033 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000889033 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000889033 9801_ $$aFullTexts