001     889033
005     20220303144734.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s11104-020-04794-9
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0032-079X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1573-5036
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/27158
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:99959713
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000600828000001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-05406
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Nakhforoosh, Alireza
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Deep soil exploration vs. topsoil exploitation: distinctive rooting strategies between wheat landraces and wild relatives
260 _ _ |a Dordrecht [u.a.]
|c 2021
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1646232360_5184
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a AimsDiversity of root systems among genetic resources can contribute to optimize water and nutrient uptake. Topsoil exploitation vs. deep soil exploration represent two contrasting ideotypes in relation to resource use. Our study reveals how rooting patterns changed between wheat wild progenitors and landraces in regard to these ideotypes.MethodsRoot (partitioning, morphology, distribution, elongation, anatomy) and shoot traits (dry-matter, leaf area, assimilation) of durum landraces, wild emmer and wild einkorn from Iran, Syria, Turkey and Lebanon were phenotyped using the GrowScreen-Rhizo platform. Distinctive rooting patterns were identified via principal component analysis and relations with collection site characteristics analyzed.ResultsShoot trait differentiation was strongly driven by seed weight, leading to superior early vigor of landraces. Wild progenitors formed superficial root systems with a higher contribution of lateral and early-emerging nodal axes to total root length. Durum landraces had a root system dominated by seminal axes allocated evenly over depth. Xylem anatomy was the trait most affected by the environmental influence of the collection site.ConclusionsThe durum landrace root system approximated a deep soil exploration ideotype which would optimize subsoil water uptake, while monococcum-type wild einkorn was most similar to a topsoil exploiting strategy with potential competitive advantages for subsistence in natural vegetation.
536 _ _ |a 2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a EPPN - European Network for Pilot Production Facilities and Innovation Hubs (768681)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)768681
|c 768681
|f H2020-NMBP-CSA-2017
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Nagel, Kerstin A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129373
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Fiorani, Fabio
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143649
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Bodner, Gernot
|0 0000-0001-9813-1364
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s11104-020-04794-9
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1478535-3
|p 397–421
|t Plant and soil
|v 459
|y 2021
|x 1573-5036
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889033/files/Nakhforoosh2021_Article_DeepSoilExplorationVsTopsoilEx.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:889033
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129373
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143649
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|x 0
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Plant Science
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2021
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-05
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PLANT SOIL : 2018
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-05
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-09-05
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2020-09-05
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-09-05
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21