% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wu:889051,
author = {Wu, Di and Zhang, Yuxue and Dong, Gao and Du, Zhangliu and
Wu, Wenliang and Chadwick, David and Bol, Roland},
title = {{T}he importance of ammonia volatilisation in estimating
the efficacy of nitrification inhibitors to reduce {N}2{O}
emissions: a global meta-analysis},
journal = {Environmental pollution},
volume = {271},
issn = {0269-7491},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-05419},
pages = {116365},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Nitrification inhibitors (NIs) have been shown to be an
effective tool to mitigate direct N2O emissions from soils.
However, emerging findings suggest that NIs may increase
soil ammonia (NH3) volatilization and, subsequently,
indirect N2O emission. A quantitative synthesis is lacking
to evaluate how NIs may affect NH3 volatilization and the
overall N2O emissions under different environmental
conditions. In this meta-analysis, we quantified the
responses of NH3 volatilization to NI application with 234
observations from 89 individual studies and analysed the
role of experimental method, soil properties, fertilizer/NI
type, fertilizer application rate and land use type as
explanatory factors. Furthermore, using data sets where soil
NH3 emission and N2O emission were measured simultaneously,
we re-evaluated the effect of NI on overall N2O emissions
including indirect N2O emission from NH3 volatilization. We
found that, on average, NIs increased NH3 volatilization by
$35.7\%$ $(95\%$ CI: $25.7–46.7\%)$ and increased indirect
N2O emission from NH3 emission (and subsequent N deposition)
by $2.9\%–15.2\%.$ Responses of NH3 volatilization mainly
varied with experimental method, soil pH, NI type and
fertilizer type. The increase of NH3 volatilization
following NI application showed a positive correlation with
soil pH (R2 = 0.04, n = 234, P < 0.05) and N fertilizer rate
(R2 = 0.04, n = 187, P < 0.05). When the indirect N2O
emission was considered, NI’s N2O mitigation effect
decreased from $48.0\%$ to $39.7\%$ (EF = $1\%),$ or
$28.2\%$ (EF = $5\%).$ The results indicate that using DMPP
with ammonium-based fertilizer in low pH, high SOC soils
would have a lower risk for increasing NH3 volatilization
than using DCD and nitrapyrin with urea in high pH, lower
SOC soil. Furthermore, reducing N application rate may help
to improve NIs’ overall N2O emission mitigation efficiency
and minimize their impact on NH3 volatilization.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {690},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {33388681},
UT = {WOS:000614114100072},
doi = {10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116365},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889051},
}