% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Barthel:889134,
      author       = {Barthel, Henryk and Arbizu, Javier and Drzezga, Alexander
                      and Garibotto, Valentina and Lammertsma, Adriaan A. and
                      Morbelli, Silvia},
      title        = {{P}roven validity and management impact of amyloid imaging
                      in {A}lzheimer’s disease—repetita juvant},
      journal      = {European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging},
      volume       = {47},
      number       = {8},
      issn         = {1619-7089},
      address      = {Heidelberg [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer-Verl.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2021-00059},
      pages        = {1787 - 1790},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {The Editorial “Suboptimal Validity of Amyloid
                      Imaging-Based Diagnosis and Management of Alzheimer’s
                      Disease: Why It Is Time to Abandon the Approach” which
                      appeared online ahead of print on October 31, 2019, in the
                      EJNMMI [1] has come to our attention. From our point of
                      view, the topic of amyloid imaging is discussed in a biased
                      and opinionated form in this Editorial. Some facts generally
                      accepted by imaging experts and neuropathologists are
                      questioned or neglected, which may leave the reader with a
                      misleading impression that does not correspond with the
                      current state of knowledge. The EANM Neuroimaging Committee,
                      thus, feels the need to correct this impression in order to
                      allow the reader to differentiate between commonly accepted
                      scientific facts versus individual opinions and matters
                      still unresolved, regarding the topic discussed. For space
                      reasons, we will discuss here only the issues with the
                      greatest risk for misleading interpretation.},
      cin          = {INM-2},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572) / 573 -
                      Neuroimaging (POF3-573)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {32130450},
      UT           = {WOS:000540800000002},
      doi          = {10.1007/s00259-020-04742-w},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/889134},
}